Question:

Hmmm, yes, I think I do care deeply about what you think, given your 10%+ unemployment, utter lack of nuts, and just plain irrelevance.

Response:

"planning ahead" spewed more Euro-Trash and is about to get it shoved up his ass: > Chez-les-Reuse<

Oh, boy, comments from the French? Hey, how many apartments are on fire this morning, eh, Froggies? > Watching the events in New Orleans unfold from here in Europe, mostly via > BBC World, ….<

Oh, THERE’s an objective source! > Among the fundamental problems revealed are:> > (1) the enormous divide between rich and poor (which has expanded rapidly > in the past two or three decades);>

Uh, Froggy, the POOR In the USA live better than the RICH in most of the third world countries either you or your Brit buddies colonized, plundered, then abandoned > (2) the racial divide leaving blacks in the poorest class (nearly all the > stranded, angry, unassisted poor we see on the TV screen are black),>

What a great revellation, that in a city where nearly 70% of th population is of African descent, most of the poor are too. As are the Mayor, the Police Chief, the Fire Dept head and every other elected official ion this most corrupt of US cities. ALL of them are pocket-lining leftist assholes, just like you! > (3) the failure to invest in infrastructure (not only the failure to > protect the dikes and levies, but the failure to storm-proof the electric > and telephone systems by burying cables, etc.);

Uh, Froggy, the city was founded by THE FRENCH, and it’s UNDER SEA LEVEL!, Not a good idea to bury electric cables UNDER THE WATER, is it, shithead? > (4) the bizarre law-and-order mentality which orders the National Guard to > shoot-to-kill looters (that is, to give priority to protecting property > more than human lives).>

I think they’re shooting the murdering thugs who have plundered the city ever since the MAYOR AND HIS COPS ran away. I suppose when all thosae those poor African immigrants you’re hiding away over there in Frog-land start burning Paris down, you’ll react with humanity & kindlness, huh? Just like you did when the krauts shipped all your Jews tro the ovens, huh? > Perhaps it is going too far to state that we are watching a collapse > similar to the collapse of the Soviet Union fifteen years ago. <

Oh, and DON’T YOU WISH!? Sorry, snail-eater, America and New Orleans will come back better than ever. And, when the last coat of paint is put on the last rebuilt house, WE WILL ALL REMEMBER YOUR WORDS, ASSHOLE!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Chez-les-Reuse > Saturday morning, 3 September 2005 > Dear S—, > Watching the events in New Orleans unfold from here in Europe, mostly via > BBC World, we have the impression that the storm blew up a corner of the > carpet beneath which America had long been sweeping some of its fundamental > problems. > Among the fundamental problems revealed are: > (1) the enormous divide between rich and poor (which has expanded rapidly > in the past two or three decades); > (2) the racial divide leaving blacks in the poorest class (nearly all the > stranded, angry, unassisted poor we see on the TV screen are black), > (3) the failure to invest in infrastructure (not only the failure to > protect the dikes and levies, but the failure to storm-proof the electric > and telephone systems by burying cables, etc.); > And, perhaps most striking of all, > (4) the bizarre law-and-order mentality which orders the National Guard to > shoot-to-kill looters (that is, to give priority to protecting property > more than human lives). > Perhaps it is going too far to state that we are watching a collapse > similar to the collapse of the Soviet Union fifteen years ago. Much as the > total-collectivization and total-centralization of society in the USSR > collapsed, eventually, of its own internal contradictions, we wonder > whether or not America, too, with its ultra-individualistic, ultra-material > ideology and its absence of much concern about the collective needs of > society (health care, education, infrastructure, etc.) will collapse of its > own internal contradictions. > One thing is for sure: America, whose reputation in Europe was already > tarnished by its go-it-alone pre-emptive invasion of Iraq, has lost even > more respect here thanks to Hurricane Katrina. This is only partly due to > the slow and stumbling response of the federal government to the tragedy. > It is due more to the revelation of some of America’s carefully hidden > social problems. > All the best, > J—

Ass hat.

Response:

> Hmmm, yes, I think I do care deeply about what you think, given your > 10%+ unemployment, utter lack of nuts, and just plain irrelevance.>

Good one! You left out the 65%+ effective tax rates the Euro-commies have forced on their citizens, which has utterly destroyed any entreprenuership or incentive to do anything beyond the bare minimum. These poor Euro-dopes get taxed at about a 45% BASIC RATE on around $30k income, then they get to pay ridiculous local sales taxes and idiotic tax rates on property, plus 15% VAT on anything they buy. (VAT is the same kind of "National Sales Tax" the leftist moonbats want to implement here.) Naturally, other than the rich, no one in Europe has any money left to buy anything beyond the bare necessities, and there’s no incentive to work any harder, to achieve anything, etc. They simply give up and go on the dole shamelessly, often for years. Unemployment rates in Europe are now WELL in excess of 10%, with no relief in sight. Think they get much back? SHIT! Oh, "FREE HEALTH CARE"? Utter crap, most hospitals are death traps you have to wait months, even years to get into for anything other than an emergency. The staffs are incompetent, government-paid shirkers, particularly the doctors, most of whom arrived off the boat from some place where the last remedy they prescribed was some roots & bat’s blood. There hasn’t been a single medical innovation from Europe in decades, most treatmnents are, on a USA scale, years behind in terms of science. Good commies all, they have no one but themselves to blame for electing Socialist bloodsuckers and then letting them stay in power to bleed them white year after year.

Response:

planning ahead wins the lamest post award of the week (or is it weak…it is European). p.a. has been officially "kicked to the curb" by SoK66, Mick, and TD. Try again.

Response:

> Perhaps it is going too far to state that we are watching a collapse > similar to the collapse of the Soviet Union fifteen years ago.

Yeah, perhaps, much as you would like to believe otherwise. > One thing is for sure: America, whose reputation in Europe was already > tarnished by its go-it-alone pre-emptive invasion of Iraq, has lost even > more respect here thanks to Hurricane Katrina. This is only partly due to > the slow and stumbling response of the federal government to the tragedy. > It is due more to the revelation of some of America’s carefully hidden > social problems.

"Carefully hidden," sure, except to anyone with a car and the guts to drive to the poor side of town.  Meanwhile, somewhere in Europe (in the parts not currently being flooded or burned down) a "guest worker" from Turkey or someplace is being stomped by the local white-supremist neo-fascists, or a synagogue is being bombed, or farmers are about to dump a hundred tonnes of manure on the steps of the local government building in protest of their subsidies being cut, and Europeans everywhere congratulate themselves on their moral superiority, and life goes on….

Response:

"DGDevin" kneed the Euro-commie in the nuts: > "Carefully hidden," sure, except to anyone with a car and the guts to > drive to the poor side of town.  Meanwhile, somewhere in Europe (in the > parts not  currently being flooded or burned down) a "guest worker" from > Turkey or someplace is being stomped by the local white-supremist > neo-fascists, or a synagogue is being bombed, or farmers are about to dump > a hundred tonnes of  manure on the steps of the local government building > in protest of their subsidies being cut, and Europeans everywhere > congratulate themselves on their moral superiority, and life goes on…. <

Good one DG! Arrogant bastards should have been left to the Germans. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Pretty hard to top the fact that they live longer and healthier that we do, isn’t it?

Response:

> Good one DG! Arrogant bastards should have been left to the Germans.

There are idiots everywhere, the U.S. has plenty too, but there is nothing so smug as a European with his nose in the air.  I was watching a travel show on New Zealand the other day, they showed sport divers visiting the wreck of the Rainbow Warrior, the Greenpeace ship protesting French nuclear testing that the French blew up killing one of the crew.  How quickly they forget….

Response:

Question:

> United’s response: She could get a full refund only if the illness was > "terminal,"

I spent 12 hours at LAX last week. There’s suffering for you. Pete, one of the huddled masses

Response:

> Wall Street Journal > So why didn’t she claim on her travel insurance?

That’s the difference between asking for charity and demanding it. She bought the cheap tickets and then tried to embarrass the airline into giving her first-class treatment when it didn’t work out. Don

Response:

I guess I’m just old fashioned when I parse "nonrefundable" as meaning um… "nonrefundable." Look, the airline can’t be expected to know the customer’s chances of getting sick better than the customer. They’re in the business of selling seats, not travel insurance. You buys your nonrefundable ticket without travel insurance, you takes your chances.

Response:

> Wall Street Journal > So why didn’t she claim on her travel insurance? > That’s the difference between asking for charity and demanding it. > She bought the cheap tickets and then tried to embarrass the airline > into giving her first-class treatment when it didn’t work out.

And $2600 for a round-trip ticket to NZ is cheap? Hard to believe she couldn’t have done better than that.

Response:

> I guess I’m just old fashioned when I parse "nonrefundable" as meaning um… > "nonrefundable." > Look, the airline can’t be expected to know the customer’s chances of > getting sick better than the customer. They’re in the business of selling > seats, not travel insurance. You buys your nonrefundable ticket without > travel insurance, you takes your chances.

"Nonrefundable" doesn’t and can’t mean absolutely nonrefundable. All tickets bought online are refundable and cancelable within 24 hours. Otherwise, what would they do if you had computer failure or your web browser goes berserk, or you click on the wrong button? And airlines are stuck with (1) legacy rules (they’ve always refunded in case of death or inability to fly for medical reasons) amd (2) competition and the potential for bad publicity. What is variable is whether you can change a reservation on payment of a surcharge. Those rules are arcane. "No changes" may or may not mean that. But how do you explain it all on a printed ticket? Or, worse, an e-ticket?

Response:

Wall Street Journal February 8, 2005 Airlines Wrestle With When to Refund The Nonrefundable By Scott McCartney After Tina Sims was diagnosed with breast cancer in December, she called United Airlines to cancel her January trip to New Zealand and to ask for a refund for her and her husband. Chemotherapy and radiation treatments would pre-empt any travel for at least eight months. United’s response: She could get a full refund only if the illness was "terminal," Ms. Sims says she was told, and unless they could rebook within three months, the airline would keep 35% of the $5,200 cost of the two tickets. "Because I couldn’t guarantee I was ‘terminal,’ they said they wouldn’t give me a refund," says the 60-year-old retired interior designer. "I wasn’t willing to go that far." So why didn’t she claim on her travel insurance? JohnT

Response:

Wall Street Journal February 8, 2005 Airlines Wrestle With When to Refund The Nonrefundable By Scott McCartney After Tina Sims was diagnosed with breast cancer in December, she called United Airlines to cancel her January trip to New Zealand and to ask for a refund for her and her husband. Chemotherapy and radiation treatments would pre-empt any travel for at least eight months. United’s response: She could get a full refund only if the illness was "terminal," Ms. Sims says she was told, and unless they could rebook within three months, the airline would keep 35% of the $5,200 cost of the two tickets. "Because I couldn’t guarantee I was ‘terminal,’ they said they wouldn’t give me a refund," says the 60-year-old retired interior designer. "I wasn’t willing to go that far." Airlines have policies in place for just about everything, but there is one set of rules that many are reluctant to put in writing: When they will refund nonrefundable tickets. For medical emergencies, most carriers say they will consider requests on a case-by-case basis. But often, this policy isn’t even noted in their fare rules or customer-service policies. The ambiguity illustrates the financial bind airlines are in — particularly today with so many carriers struggling to regain profitability — when dealing with special passenger requests. It might seem that airlines would be accommodating on refunds like these. After all, they routinely overbook flights, which protects them financially from unexpected events like last-minute cancellations. But what airlines prefer to do in cases of medical emergencies is to keep the money paid and give customers one year to rebook, typically a year from the date of purchase. It is a tricky situation because it is, after all, ripe for abuse: Customers could easily skirt rules simply by declaring illness. Want an extra couple days on the beach without paying a higher fare to rebook? Just say you were sick. According to one longtime airline supervisor, who often has to deal with irate customers, waiving the rules for illness can be problematic. Verifying sudden illness over the phone is impossible; having people bring notes from doctors to the airport is hardly more practical. In obvious cases, airlines do waive rules, if customers push hard enough. But to avoid abuse, they make it tough. That can lead to horrible situations, such as telling cancer patients they are only entitled to refunds if they die. In Ms. Sims’s case, UAL Corp.’s United says its call-center representatives — Ms. Sims talked to several — misinformed her. The airline does give full refunds for serious illnesses that prevent travel if customers produce a note from a doctor. United called Ms. Sims to offer a refund after The Wall Street Journal inquired about the case. "I’m sorry she got that information [that refunds are only given for death], because it’s just wrong," United spokeswoman Robin Urbanski said. Unwritten Policy However, its written fare rules don’t make that clear. There is no written policy spelling out what United will do for medical emergencies, and, in fact, the seven pages of rules on a Washington-to-Queensland, New Zealand, round-trip ticket, corroborate exactly what United’s agents told Ms. Sims. It adds up to a refund if you die, but only 65% if short of that. In a case that arose in September, US Airways Group Inc. initially refused to refund $2,756 of tickets to a Philadelphia family that had to cancel a trip to Cancun, Mexico, after learning their 6-year-old son’s cancer had grown and additional chemotherapy would be needed. The family feared they would need the money for their son’s treatment, and sent documentation from their son’s oncologist. US Airways was trying to work out a credit for the family, but a representative left the family a phone message saying the airline’s bankruptcy prevented a refund, unless someone in the family were to die. The family called a local television station, causing a furor. US Airways says it refunded the family’s ticket. In addition, US Airways employees also set up a fund for the boy, Michael Urban, at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Case-by-Case Today, Southwest Airlines uses a tape of the TV station’s report about Michael Urban in its customer-service training. "We tell all our agents to do the right thing for the customer," says Lisa Anderson, Southwest’s director of customer advocacy. Southwest gives all customers a year to use nonrefundable tickets, without a change fee, if trips are canceled. The airline says if customers prefer a refund because of medical problems, it will do that. AMR Corp.’s American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Northwest Airlines, Continental Airlines and other carriers all said they work with customers case by case. A Northwest spokesman was fairly forthright: "In the case of a serious medical condition, a refund would also be allowed on most fares." Certain airlines hold their cards close to the vest. A spokesperson at one major airline said refunds aren’t normally given on nonrefundable tickets, then added on condition that the airline’s name not be given, that the airline does refund tickets for serious medical illness, but doesn’t want that publicized. A representative at another carrier said it does use discretion, but "that’s not something we talk about." One option for travelers worried about medical cancellations and the likely airline hassles that might result is travel insurance. In general, travel insurers will cover trips cancelled due to pre-existing medical conditions if the insurance is bought between seven and 21 days after making the first payment for the trip, according to Peter Evans of Insuremytrip.com, a comparison shopping site for travel insurance. A basic policy that would protect against medical emergencies can cost several hundred dollars for an international itinerary — pricey peace of mind, and not necessary if the airline does the right thing. But for some customers, that might be preferable to an unpleasant battle with airline representatives at time of illness. GETTING A TICKET REFUND Airlines are vague about giving refunds in cases of medical emergency. Some advice on getting the money back:

Question:

> > And while you’re at it, dock the 4000+ passenger cruise ships, > ah yank paranoia. > torpedoing them wuld be mor fun and satisfying

No, get the US submarines to do their trick of emergency surfacing without looking if there is a ship above them, and do that right under those big cruise ships to see which of the two survive :-)

Response:

With the "cattle car" configuration, the A380 is capable of holding 850 pax…..with your figures, it seems very logical for a 1000 pax jet.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "They’re looking like they may well go for that. That would be another > 200 seats so you could get about 1100 people in it." > The 380 is currently at 73 metres. So only 7 more metres can be added. > Assuming 32" pitch and no bulkhead, that is 8 additional rows of seats. > At 18 people per row (10 downstairs, 8 upstairs), that gets 144 more > seats. > So the only way to get more than 144 extra pax is to reduce > business/first sections to increase seating density with coach seats. > Although there have been concerns that the aircraft is overweight, > Airbus says it has addressed the issue and does not expect any > problems. > They bought a giant threadmill on which the 380 could exercise inside > the hangar before it is allowed to go do some exercises outdoors :-)

Response:

Is it just me or does anyone else keep thinking about the Hindenburg when they see the A380? "oh, the humanity"

Response:

> "They’re looking like they may well go for that. That would be another > 200 seats so you could get about 1100 people in it."

The 380 is currently at 73 metres. So only 7 more metres can be added. Assuming 32" pitch and no bulkhead, that is 8 additional rows of seats. At 18 people per row (10 downstairs, 8 upstairs), that gets 144 more seats. So the only way to get more than 144 extra pax is to reduce business/first sections to increase seating density with coach seats. > Although there have been concerns that the aircraft is overweight, > Airbus says it has addressed the issue and does not expect any > problems.

They bought a giant threadmill on which the 380 could exercise inside the hangar before it is allowed to go do some exercises outdoors :-)

Response:

> Is it just me or does anyone else keep thinking about the Hindenburg when > they see the A380? "oh, the humanity"

Hehe…maybe if we’re lucky the A380 will crash while doing it’s fly – by at the Paris Air Show… — Best Greg

Response:

>> Is it just me or does anyone else keep thinking about the Hindenburg when > they see the A380? "oh, the humanity" > Hehe…maybe if we’re lucky the A380 will crash while doing it’s fly – by > at > the Paris Air Show…

And while you’re at it, dock the 4000+ passenger cruise ships, ah yank paranoia.

Response:

Nothing new there, the A380-800 was built as a shrinked version with the "normal" A380-900 to follow.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> Is it just me or does anyone else keep thinking about the Hindenburg when >> they see the A380? "oh, the humanity" > Hehe…maybe if we’re lucky the A380 will crash while doing it’s fly – by > at > the Paris Air Show… > And while you’re at it, dock the 4000+ passenger cruise ships, > ah yank paranoia.

torpedoing them wuld be mor fun and satisfying

Response:

January 21, 2005 EUROPEAN manufacturer Airbus is under pressure to make the world’s biggest passenger aircraft even bigger. Airlines including Emirates and Virgin Atlantic are already lobbying for a stretch version of the plane, which could carry more than 1000 people on shorter, heavily travelled routes. "We’ve been talking to them about doing a stretch version, a longer version of the current plane that you saw today," Virgin Atlantic chairman Richard Branson said at this week’s A380 unveiling. "They’re looking like they may well go for that. That would be another 200 seats so you could get about 1100 people in it." Emirates plans to use the A380 in a three-class, 489-seat configuration on routes to Australia and New Zealand but it also will have a two-class configuration carrying 644 people. "Within seven hours of Dubai there are very, very dense routes," Emirates president Tim Clark said. "We’ve got the whole of the Indian sub-continent, Pakistan, west Asia. You’ve got East Asia as well, Thailand — so there are plenty of places we can put this aeroplane to work, no problems about that. "Today we have 434-seat 777-300s in two classes and they’re operating at over 90 per cent in everything we do." The first version of the giant aircraft was revealed on Tuesday in new Airbus livery amid fanfare and political back-slapping. About 5000 guests, including the leaders of Britain, Germany, France and Spain, watched the lavish unveiling in the aircraft’s giant assembly building in Toulouse, France. The event is rumoured to have cost E5million ($8.6 million). European leaders hailed the aircraft as a milestone in industrial and technical co-operation that placed the European Union ahead of its major rival, the US. Airbus and some airline executives are predicting the giant aircraft will prompt US manufacturer Boeing to axe production of the A380’s iconic predecessor, the Boeing 747. Airline executives expect the A380 to begin a rigorous program of up to 1000 hours of flight testing in March, although one Airbus source said it could be sooner. Powered by giant engines certified for up to 80,000 pounds of thrust, the super jumbo is capable of flying up to 15,000km with a promised reduction in operating costs per seat of 15 per cent. The aircraft is due to enter service on Singapore Airlines’ London-Sydney route by the end of June 2006. Airbus is initially producing passenger and freighter versions of the aircraft, and has sold 149 A380s to 14 operators. Qantas has bought 12 and plans to deploy the first four on routes from Melbourne and Sydney to Los Angeles towards the end of next year. The aircraft is designed to meet higher pollution and noise requirements now being demanded by authorities. Engine maker Rolls-Royce says the Trent 900 engine chosen by Qantas is its lightest, cleanest and quietest. With a 116-inch (295cm) fan diameter, the Trent 900 is also the biggest engine ever built by Rolls. Four A380s have so far been assembled in Toulouse. The first to fly, MSN001, has completed ground tests and will shortly be handed over to the Airbus flight test department. The ground tests probed the aircraft’s hydraulics, landing gear, electrics and flight controls. The aircraft was also pumped full of air at a third higher than normal pressure to measure stresses that pressurisation might cause on the cabin. The flight test department has been performing a "virtual first flight campaign" using the A380’s onboard computers in cockpit systems prior to the first flight. Although there have been concerns that the aircraft is overweight, Airbus says it has addressed the issue and does not expect any problems.

Response:

Question:

…smart to go? hello, I am planing to travel to NZ in August 2005 (25.07 – 05.09.) but is it smart to go there in the winter? The plan is to travel around the north and south island by bus (kiwi experience?) now is my question how bad/cold/wet is the weather in NZ at these time in the year? and there are any outdoor-activities/tours you can do only in the summertime? because I don’t want to read every day a new sign with "open only in the summertime"… and – I know these is a stupid question… but what I have to do (to see) in NZ?!? Auckland => down to Wellington… after that to the south-island: … => christchurch … around the southisland…and flying home from christchurch. a goog plan for 4,5 weeks or should I change something? there are other crazy backpackers on tour in the winter or will I be allone? best regards achim

Response:

> …smart to go? > hello, > I am planing to travel to NZ in August 2005 > (25.07 – 05.09.) but is it smart to go there > in the winter? > The plan is to travel around the north and > south island by bus (kiwi experience?) now > is my question how bad/cold/wet is the weather > in NZ at these time in the year?

I just spent my first winter in the south island of New Zealand (Christchurch). The weather is not particularly cold but plenty of snow in the mountains for great skiing. A lot of rain on the west coast at any time of year but pretty good elsewhere, lots of fine, crisp days. > and there are any outdoor-activities/tours > you can do only in the summertime? because > I don’t want to read every day a new sign > with "open only in the summertime"…

There are some restrictions on hunting and fishing but I’m not sure what they are. Most things are running in Winter. > and – I know these is a stupid question… > but what I have to do (to see) in NZ?!? > Auckland => down to Wellington… after that > to the south-island: … => christchurch … > around the southisland…and flying home from > christchurch. > a goog plan for 4,5 weeks or should I change > something? > there are other crazy backpackers on tour in > the winter or will I be allone?

There are heaps of tourists, skiiers, adventurers. Do carry snow chains when you are driving. The snow is not heavy but it can bring you to a standstill if you’re not prepared. Make sure you see Queenstown, Franz Joseph, Aoraki Mt Cook. Check out our blog at http://www.galleryvittoria.com/nzblog for ideas. cheers Brooklyn Waters

Response:

> …smart to go? > hello, > I am planing to travel to NZ in August 2005 > (25.07 – 05.09.) but is it smart to go there > in the winter?

Hello Achim, I went there in the winter of 2003 and thoroughly recommend it. Firstly, flights from Europe are much cheaper then, also once you get there so is car hire. > The plan is to travel around the north and > south island by bus (kiwi experience?) now > is my question how bad/cold/wet is the weather > in NZ at these time in the year?

Auckland- lots of rain but not cold (not to me anyway) About 12-15C by day, 7-10 at night. Wellington- windy, chilly but not freezing, ‘if you don’t like it, wait a minute’ type weather! Central N.Island- mix of and sunny days and showers, day temps similar to Wellington but nights colder, sometimes below freezing. S.Island- eastern part much drier than Auckland, expect bright, chilly days and frosty nights. Winter temperatures in Christchurch/Dunedin are similar to in England, but with noticeably more sunshine. Westland is wet all year round. > and there are any outdoor-activities/tours > you can do only in the summertime? because > I don’t want to read every day a new sign > with "open only in the summertime"…

I was there July 2003, and compared with the UK where I live things do not shut down for the winter at all! Hostels etc. stay open, Kiwi Experience and the intercity buses keep running, only thing that could be difficult is bathing in the sea! > and – I know these is a stupid question… > but what I have to do (to see) in NZ?!? > Auckland => down to Wellington

Stop in Rotorua; see the geysers, go to a concert/hangi, and go for a dip in the Polynesian Spa pools (cold winter nights are definitely the best time to appreciate these). Also a day in Taupo- everything stays open there. … after that > to the south-island: … => christchurch … > around the southisland…and flying home from > christchurch.

See Kaikoura; the whale-watching runs through the winter and mustn’t be missed. Again, winter may be best because of fewer (but not no) other tourists. If you’ve a few days spare, go to Stewart Island. Awesome for just getting away from it all. Yes you can get there in winter- the pub and shop stay open too. > a goog plan for 4,5 weeks or should I change > something? > there are other crazy backpackers on tour in > the winter or will I be allone?

Plenty, enough to meet people but not so many that they take over the place as I’m told can happen in summer. You’ll see many on round-the-world tickets. Finding accommodation is easy except in Queenstown and other ski areas where you should book ahead. Have a great time.

Response:

I’m planning to do exactly the same, and have the same concerns!!!!! Will be very interested in your travel plans & itinerary. I’m still working on what we want to do and see!

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> …smart to go? > hello, > I am planing to travel to NZ in August 2005 > (25.07 – 05.09.) but is it smart to go there > in the winter? > The plan is to travel around the north and > south island by bus (kiwi experience?) now > is my question how bad/cold/wet is the weather > in NZ at these time in the year? > and there are any outdoor-activities/tours > you can do only in the summertime? because > I don’t want to read every day a new sign > with "open only in the summertime"… > and – I know these is a stupid question… > but what I have to do (to see) in NZ?!? > Auckland => down to Wellington… after that > to the south-island: … => christchurch … > around the southisland…and flying home from > christchurch. > a goog plan for 4,5 weeks or should I change > something? > there are other crazy backpackers on tour in > the winter or will I be allone? > best regards > achim

Response:

Winter’s fine.  There is snow on the glaciers so you’ll get to cover more ground.  Plus the days in winter are more likely to be clear (in Franz Joseph and Fox).  The slopes for skiing/boarding will be in full swing.  You can still bungy, raft and ski dive, but obviously it will be colder. Walking/hiking/trekking/tramping (or whatever you want to call it -> NZ uses tramping) is a different story.  Most of the great walk tracks are closed. The Milford track will be closed, since DOC (Department of Conservation) removes the bridges.  The Tongariro crossing will cost you double because in winter you need a guide and boots with crampons.  The Routeburn, Rees-Dart, Greenstone-Caples, Kepler, and various other tracks will be accessible, but alpine experience will be required (typically it will only be a portion of the track that is under snow).  Nights at higher altitude will be below freezing. Kiwiexp will get you around the country, and you’ll see all the major sites, but it’s becoming more and more like a pub crawl.  The best way to see NZ is to buy/hire a car or hitch.  Take the bus if you’re stuck. If there is anything in specific you want to do (ski/board, jet boating, sky dive…) or see (scenery, wildlife, sea life…) let me know.  I was in NZ for a year with a working holiday visa (got back to Canada (home) recently). Dwayne

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> …smart to go? > hello, > I am planing to travel to NZ in August 2005 > (25.07 – 05.09.) but is it smart to go there > in the winter? > The plan is to travel around the north and > south island by bus (kiwi experience?) now > is my question how bad/cold/wet is the weather > in NZ at these time in the year? > and there are any outdoor-activities/tours > you can do only in the summertime? because > I don’t want to read every day a new sign > with "open only in the summertime"… > and – I know these is a stupid question… > but what I have to do (to see) in NZ?!? > Auckland => down to Wellington… after that > to the south-island: … => christchurch … > around the southisland…and flying home from > christchurch. > a goog plan for 4,5 weeks or should I change > something? > there are other crazy backpackers on tour in > the winter or will I be allone? > best regards > achim

Response:

> The plan is to travel around the north and > south island by bus (kiwi experience?) now > is my question how bad/cold/wet is the weather > in NZ at these time in the year?

Kiwi Experience is not a good insight as to what we kiwis are really like. But if you want to spend your holiday nursing a hangover and sleeping between destinations because of hangover then this is the one for you.

Response:

Question:

I am trying to find 2 or 3 bedroom self contained apartment accommodation in Christchurch for approx 6 days next September but am having trouble finding anything suitable via the internet. Can someone recommend anything or even a suitable website to search with.

Response:

Is there any reason you need a self-contained apartment? I don’t know if you know it but most newer motels in NZ are like small apartments with all kitchen facilities and well apointed bathrooms. Some newer motels have larger three-bedroom units and most have nice two bedroom ones. I often use them for my family including three kids. Hope this helps. Kind regards Nigel in NZ

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am trying to find 2 or 3 bedroom self contained apartment accommodation in > Christchurch for approx 6 days next September but am having trouble finding > anything suitable via the internet. > Can someone recommend anything or even a suitable website to search with.

Response:

Nigel, That is exactly what I am seeking for our family of 2 adults and three children. Do you use web searches to find suitable accommodation? …. if so, can you advise which sites please.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is there any reason you need a self-contained apartment? I don’t know if > you > know it but most newer motels in NZ are like small apartments with all > kitchen facilities and well apointed bathrooms. Some newer motels have > larger three-bedroom units and most have nice two bedroom ones. I often > use > them for my family including three kids. Hope this helps. > Kind regards > Nigel in NZ > I am trying to find 2 or 3 bedroom self contained apartment accommodation > in > Christchurch for approx 6 days next September but am having trouble > finding > anything suitable via the internet. > Can someone recommend anything or even a suitable website to search with.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is there any reason you need a self-contained apartment? I don’t know if > you > know it but most newer motels in NZ are like small apartments with all > kitchen facilities and well apointed bathrooms. Some newer motels have > larger three-bedroom units and most have nice two bedroom ones. I often > use > them for my family including three kids. Hope this helps. > Kind regards > Nigel in NZ >> I am trying to find 2 or 3 bedroom self contained apartment accommodation > in >> Christchurch for approx 6 days next September but am having trouble > finding >> anything suitable via the internet. >> Can someone recommend anything or even a suitable website to search with. >Nigel, >That is exactly what I am seeking for our family of 2 adults and three >children. Do you use web searches to find suitable accommodation? …. if >so, can you advise which sites please.

www.purenz.com www.aaguide.co.nz www.yellowpages.co.nz Any search engine using accommodation Christchurch New Zealand should bring you urls. Cath

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Nigel, > That is exactly what I am seeking for our family of 2 adults and three > children. Do you use web searches to find suitable accommodation? …. if > so, can you advise which sites please. > Is there any reason you need a self-contained apartment? I don’t know if > you > know it but most newer motels in NZ are like small apartments with all > kitchen facilities and well apointed bathrooms. Some newer motels have > larger three-bedroom units and most have nice two bedroom ones. I often > use > them for my family including three kids. Hope this helps. > Kind regards > Nigel in NZ >> I am trying to find 2 or 3 bedroom self contained apartment accommodation > in >> Christchurch for approx 6 days next September but am having trouble > finding >> anything suitable via the internet. >> Can someone recommend anything or even a suitable website to search with.

Depends whether you will have a car  or not & what part of Chch you want but for a start here a few.  I  am a local so don’t stay in the motels, but I know the area well: Colonial Inn, Papanui Rd (has 4 x 2bdr & 1 x 3bdr units) – www.colonialinnmotel.co.nz Colombo-in-the-City – www.motelcolombo.co.nz City Centre Motel – www.citycentremotel.co.nz Riccarton Motor lodge – www.riccartonmotorlodge.com Tuscana Motor Lodge – www.tuscana.co.nz Southern Comfort Motel (has 2 & 4 brm apartments) – www.southerncomfort.co.nz Strathern Motor Lodge – www.strathern.com Hope these will do for starters – otherwise try wwww.jasons.com Vicki

Response:

[msge snipped] Vicki, the old stone building on the corner of Cranmer Square & ?Durham that was turned into apartments,   do they still have serviced apartments available? Cath

Response:

> [msge snipped] > Vicki, the old stone building on the corner of Cranmer Square & > ?Durham that was turned into apartments,   do they still have serviced > apartments available? > Cath

You mean the old primary school (Montreal St)? – to the best of my knowledge these are all private apartments.  However now that you mention old buildings there is also "Peterborough" – the old Teachers’ College on the cnr of Montreal & Peterborough and I never thought of the Heritage Apartments right in Cathedral Square – that was the old Government Offices "behind" the Cathedral.  They are now a mix of privately occupied & serviced apartments run in conjunction with the adjoining Heritage Hotel.  I’ll see what I can find on Google about them Vicki

Response:

The Heritage Apartments can be found at http://www.innz.co.nz/host/h/heritagechristchurch.html There seem to be a couple of privately operated apartments in the Peterborough Apartments but I can’t find any in the old school in Cranmer Square.  My search did bring up more options than I had ever thought of (for the original poster) including Chateau blanc also on the Cnr of Cranmer Square & Montreal St and the fabulous new Clearwater (golfing) Resort out near the airport. Vicki  

Response:

Question:

I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! Time schedule is June 2005. Ta! MMG

Response:

Grenaghan says… > I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to > make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone > recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! > Time schedule is June 2005.

Cripes. June is the beginning of winter and the days are at their shortest, especially on the South Island where the scenery is, mostly. It will be cold and wet in many places. Lots of snow, but that might make travel over the more spectacular passes "iffy". One trip you might like to make is to the Northland, that long skinny bit right at the top north of Auckland. Fly in, take a day to get over jet lag, pick up a car or campervan and head north up one coast and down the other. Some great ocean views, especially near Opononi. Lots of forests and immense trees. Waitangi and the Bay of Islands is glorious coastal scenery. There are cruises out amongst the islands and the whole place is geared for tourists. A pity you can’t take one of the cruise ships that do a four or five day tour in the summer months. Auckland to Wellington to Christchurch to Dunedin to Milford Sound, spending a day at each city and cruising at night. Bit pricey, but a great way of seeing at least the coast.

Response:

MAP: http://www.backpack-newzealand.com/mapofsouthisland.html Christchurch to Greymouth through Arthur’s Pass (Hokitika if you hire a car) Franz Joseph & Fox Glaciers (plus Lake Matheson walk) Good views from Rob Roy (Mt. Aspiring National Park) and Mt. Iron Queenstown (Ski or Board Cornet Peak or Remarkables, TC’s the best) Good views from the Ben Lomond Saddle, plus you can get to the highest hill above the Gondola (side track). Hire a car (if you don’t already have one) drive to Te Anau. Drive to Milford (2 hours if you don’t stop, I spent 4 hours and missed the walk to Key Summit and Lake Merian each is 3 hour). Stay in Milford if you can this time of year, I’m assuming you can (bring food, there no shops only a cafe) Take the cruise (underwater observatory is ok, if you dive then it sux, if you’re on a budget skip it) You NEED rain to see Milford at it’s finest. The day trip to Milford from Queenstown is 13hour, and it’s a rushed 13hours. Then back to Queenstown and the Christchurch If you still have some time go to Mount Cook Village before ending in Christchurch. Don’t bother taking a Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown.  It’s cheaper and better to buy the guidebook (BEFORE you’re in Queenstown) and hiring a car. If you stay in backpackers you should meet up with people who want to do the same things and can share the cost (NZ is very friendly). Enjoy, Dwayne – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to > make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone > recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! > Time schedule is June 2005. > Ta! > MMG

Response:

> Grenaghan says… > I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to > make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone > recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! > Time schedule is June 2005. > Cripes. June is the beginning of winter and the days are at their > shortest, especially on the South Island where the scenery is, mostly. > It will be cold and wet in many places. Lots of snow, but that might > make travel over the more spectacular passes "iffy".

Snow in June? Unlikely. — Burn the land and boil the sea,  You can’t take the sky from me.

Response:

says… > Grenaghan says… >> I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to >> make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone >> recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! >> Time schedule is June 2005. > Cripes. June is the beginning of winter and the days are at their > shortest, especially on the South Island where the scenery is, mostly. > It will be cold and wet in many places. Lots of snow, but that might > make travel over the more spectacular passes "iffy". > Snow in June? Unlikely.

"New Zealand’s ski seasons vary but are generally, in the South Island from early-June until early October and, in the North Island from late June to mid-November. " http://www.snow.co.nz/areas/area_index.asp Perhaps you’d best get onto the people who set the dates for the ski seasons and tell them they have their heads up their bums. Pete

Response:

Hi Dwayne, If I don’t need to join the Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown, shall I allow to walk into the forest by myself.  I remember a NZ tour book mentions that noone allows to get into the forest by themselves unless they join the Lord if the Rings tour.  Is that true? Ta! PC

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> MAP: > http://www.backpack-newzealand.com/mapofsouthisland.html > Christchurch to Greymouth through Arthur’s Pass (Hokitika if you hire a car) > Franz Joseph & Fox Glaciers (plus Lake Matheson walk) > Good views from Rob Roy (Mt. Aspiring National Park) and Mt. Iron > Queenstown (Ski or Board Cornet Peak or Remarkables, TC’s the best) > Good views from the Ben Lomond Saddle, plus you can get to the highest hill > above the Gondola (side track). > Hire a car (if you don’t already have one) drive to Te Anau. > Drive to Milford (2 hours if you don’t stop, I spent 4 hours and missed the > walk to Key Summit and Lake Merian each is 3 hour). > Stay in Milford if you can this time of year, I’m assuming you can (bring > food, there no shops only a cafe) > Take the cruise (underwater observatory is ok, if you dive then it sux, if > you’re on a budget skip it) > You NEED rain to see Milford at it’s finest. > The day trip to Milford from Queenstown is 13hour, and it’s a rushed > 13hours. > Then back to Queenstown and the Christchurch > If you still have some time go to Mount Cook Village before ending in > Christchurch. > Don’t bother taking a Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown.  It’s cheaper > and better to buy the guidebook (BEFORE you’re in Queenstown) and hiring a > car. If you stay in backpackers you should meet up with people who want to > do the same things and can share the cost (NZ is very friendly). > Enjoy, > Dwayne > I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to > make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone > recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! > Time schedule is June 2005. > Ta! > MMG

Response:

> Hi Dwayne, > If I don’t need to join the Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown, shall I > allow to walk into the forest by myself.  I remember a NZ tour book mentions > that noone allows to get into the forest by themselves unless they join the > Lord if the Rings tour.  Is that true? > Ta! > PC

Of course you can walk in the "bush" by yourself.  There are no charges to enter any National parks in NZ and there are over 12,000Km of tracks (info from DOC website).  One of my favourites is the Matukituki Valley – Rob Roy glacier walk, near Wanaka.  Many of the LOTR sites are composites and others are computer generated so don’t expect to see exactly what you saw on screen. The latest movie to be filmed in the beautiful SI "High Country" is C S Lewis’ The Lion, the Witch & the Wardrobe. Vicki

Response:

> Hi Dwayne, > If I don’t need to join the Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown, shall I > allow to walk into the forest by myself.  I remember a NZ tour book mentions > that noone allows to get into the forest by themselves unless they join the > Lord if the Rings tour.  Is that true?

Of course it isn’t. But the trolls tend to avoid large groups in flavour of sole travellers. Quite often those who walk in alone are carried out. Or never make it out at all. At the very least, find a fellow traveller to enter in the forest.

Response:

The only locations that can/are a problem are the scenes filmed on private land.  One of the great things about NZ is that it’s beauty was not commercialized (until the LOTR films).  Unfortunately there are people who are out to make a quick buck (actually more like a quick hundred).  This WILL reflect negatively on the NZ tourism industry’s bottom line, in the future as the hype of the films die out. There are some good stories, but you talk with the locals about what went on.  Like how the actor who portrayed Boromir actually climbed Mount Earnslaw (it took him 2 days), because he was afraid to ride in a helicopter to shoot a scene (the snowy mountain in Fellowship where Aaragon says to Gandalf "We must turn back!").  This mountain was also used as K2 in the movie Vertical Limit.  And the north side of Mount Earnslaw and it’s surroundings were used when Gandalf was riding to Isengard (when the camera pans wide). There are few things you need to realize before you start going to the film locations.  Most of the locations used were enhanced digitally or converted for the film and then converted back to their original state (so you may not recognize much). There are some amazing locations in NZ that did not appear in the film.  In my opinion. you should go to NZ to see the beauty of the country and learn about the people, their way of life and their history.  If you stumble upon a set, good. If not, I wouldn’t worry about it.  One of my best views in NZ was at the top of Treble Cone ski field on a cloudless day during spring.  Standing on top of a snow covered mountain with heaps of powder beneath my feet.  And way down in the valley, vivid green grass, and the hills, mountains and blue sky reflecting in the two crystal clear lakes. I can still taste the crisp air. Spend a couple of days exploring Fiordland, learn about Maori culture, do a bungy jump, a bone/greenstone carving, or climb a mountain and you’ll forget about the movies. Dwayne

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi Dwayne, > If I don’t need to join the Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown, shall I > allow to walk into the forest by myself.  I remember a NZ tour book mentions > that noone allows to get into the forest by themselves unless they join the > Lord if the Rings tour.  Is that true? > Ta! > PC > MAP: > http://www.backpack-newzealand.com/mapofsouthisland.html > Christchurch to Greymouth through Arthur’s Pass (Hokitika if you hire a > car) > Franz Joseph & Fox Glaciers (plus Lake Matheson walk) > Good views from Rob Roy (Mt. Aspiring National Park) and Mt. Iron > Queenstown (Ski or Board Cornet Peak or Remarkables, TC’s the best) > Good views from the Ben Lomond Saddle, plus you can get to the highest > hill > above the Gondola (side track). > Hire a car (if you don’t already have one) drive to Te Anau. > Drive to Milford (2 hours if you don’t stop, I spent 4 hours and missed > the > walk to Key Summit and Lake Merian each is 3 hour). > Stay in Milford if you can this time of year, I’m assuming you can (bring > food, there no shops only a cafe) > Take the cruise (underwater observatory is ok, if you dive then it sux, if > you’re on a budget skip it) > You NEED rain to see Milford at it’s finest. > The day trip to Milford from Queenstown is 13hour, and it’s a rushed > 13hours. > Then back to Queenstown and the Christchurch > If you still have some time go to Mount Cook Village before ending in > Christchurch. > Don’t bother taking a Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown.  It’s cheaper > and better to buy the guidebook (BEFORE you’re in Queenstown) and hiring a > car. If you stay in backpackers you should meet up with people who want to > do the same things and can share the cost (NZ is very friendly). > Enjoy, > Dwayne > > I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to > > make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone > > recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! > > Time schedule is June 2005. > > Ta! > > MMG

Response:

> Spend a couple of days exploring Fiordland, learn about Maori culture, do a > bungy jump, a bone/greenstone carving, or climb a mountain and you’ll forget > about the movies.

I disagree – who could forget them? But yeah, the movies are the icing on the cake. New Zealand is wonderful, every bit of it, and some places are pure magic. The scenery inspired the movie, not the other way around. My book, Bookcrossing Through Middle-Earth, touches on the film and locations, but I talk mainly of the land and the people. http://www.lulu.com/content/56751 Pete

Response:

> "New Zealand’s ski seasons vary but are generally, in the South Island > from early-June until early October and, in the North Island from late > June to mid-November. " > http://www.snow.co.nz/areas/area_index.asp

Anyone turning up expecting to ski in June would be taking a risk. However skifields do tend to be in the mountains. The chance of snow impacting anyone’s travels etc in June [even the mountain passes], is remote. > Perhaps you’d best get onto the people who set the dates for the ski > seasons and tell them they have their heads up their bums.

Indeed. — Burn the land and boil the sea,  You can’t take the sky from me.

Response:

If I have only one full day to spend in mid Nov for taking photos & hiking, but not skiing, I’m still deciding whether I shall go to Treble Cone or Arthur Pass?  Which scenery is better for fulfilling my interests in regards of weather also? Ta! PC

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> The only locations that can/are a problem are the scenes filmed on private > land.  One of the great things about NZ is that it’s beauty was not > commercialized (until the LOTR films).  Unfortunately there are people who > are out to make a quick buck (actually more like a quick hundred).  This > WILL reflect negatively on the NZ tourism industry’s bottom line, in the > future as the hype of the films die out. > There are some good stories, but you talk with the locals about what went > on.  Like how the actor who portrayed Boromir actually climbed Mount > Earnslaw (it took him 2 days), because he was afraid to ride in a helicopter > to shoot a scene (the snowy mountain in Fellowship where Aaragon says to > Gandalf "We must turn back!").  This mountain was also used as K2 in the > movie Vertical Limit.  And the north side of Mount Earnslaw and it’s > surroundings were used when Gandalf was riding to Isengard (when the camera > pans wide). > There are few things you need to realize before you start going to the film > locations.  Most of the locations used were enhanced digitally or converted > for the film and then converted back to their original state (so you may not > recognize much). There are some amazing locations in NZ that did not appear > in the film.  In my opinion. you should go to NZ to see the beauty of the > country and learn about the people, their way of life and their history. If > you stumble upon a set, good. If not, I wouldn’t worry about it.  One of my > best views in NZ was at the top of Treble Cone ski field on a cloudless day > during spring.  Standing on top of a snow covered mountain with heaps of > powder beneath my feet.  And way down in the valley, vivid green grass, and > the hills, mountains and blue sky reflecting in the two crystal clear lakes. > I can still taste the crisp air. > Spend a couple of days exploring Fiordland, learn about Maori culture, do a > bungy jump, a bone/greenstone carving, or climb a mountain and you’ll forget > about the movies. > Dwayne > Hi Dwayne, > If I don’t need to join the Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown, shall I > allow to walk into the forest by myself.  I remember a NZ tour book > mentions > that noone allows to get into the forest by themselves unless they join > the > Lord if the Rings tour.  Is that true? > Ta! > PC > > MAP: > > http://www.backpack-newzealand.com/mapofsouthisland.html > > Christchurch to Greymouth through Arthur’s Pass (Hokitika if you hire a > car) > > Franz Joseph & Fox Glaciers (plus Lake Matheson walk) > > Good views from Rob Roy (Mt. Aspiring National Park) and Mt. Iron > > Queenstown (Ski or Board Cornet Peak or Remarkables, TC’s the best) > > Good views from the Ben Lomond Saddle, plus you can get to the highest > hill > > above the Gondola (side track). > > Hire a car (if you don’t already have one) drive to Te Anau. > > Drive to Milford (2 hours if you don’t stop, I spent 4 hours and missed > the > > walk to Key Summit and Lake Merian each is 3 hour). > > Stay in Milford if you can this time of year, I’m assuming you can > (bring > > food, there no shops only a cafe) > > Take the cruise (underwater observatory is ok, if you dive then it sux, > if > > you’re on a budget skip it) > > You NEED rain to see Milford at it’s finest. > > The day trip to Milford from Queenstown is 13hour, and it’s a rushed > > 13hours. > > Then back to Queenstown and the Christchurch > > If you still have some time go to Mount Cook Village before ending in > > Christchurch. > > Don’t bother taking a Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown.  It’s > cheaper > > and better to buy the guidebook (BEFORE you’re in Queenstown) and hiring > a > > car. If you stay in backpackers you should meet up with people who want > to > > do the same things and can share the cost (NZ is very friendly). > > Enjoy, > > Dwayne > > > I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to > > > make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone > > > recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! > > > Time schedule is June 2005. > > > Ta! > > > MMG

Response:

Best thing to do would be to google for images for Mount Aspiring National Park, and Arthur Pass National Parks. www.google.co.nz Plan both trips, because you will be limited by the weather, so if you have good weather in one location take it.  If it’s not good, try your luck on the other.  Usually if the weather is good on the West coast, it’s bad on the East coast (and vise versa).  The Southern Alps are the dividing line (the weather flows from the West towards the East). Dwayne

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> If I have only one full day to spend in mid Nov for taking photos & hiking, > but not skiing, I’m still deciding whether I shall go to Treble Cone or > Arthur Pass?  Which scenery is better for fulfilling my interests in regards > of weather also? > Ta! > PC > The only locations that can/are a problem are the scenes filmed on private > land.  One of the great things about NZ is that it’s beauty was not > commercialized (until the LOTR films).  Unfortunately there are people who > are out to make a quick buck (actually more like a quick hundred).  This > WILL reflect negatively on the NZ tourism industry’s bottom line, in the > future as the hype of the films die out. > There are some good stories, but you talk with the locals about what went > on.  Like how the actor who portrayed Boromir actually climbed Mount > Earnslaw (it took him 2 days), because he was afraid to ride in a > helicopter > to shoot a scene (the snowy mountain in Fellowship where Aaragon says to > Gandalf "We must turn back!").  This mountain was also used as K2 in the > movie Vertical Limit.  And the north side of Mount Earnslaw and it’s > surroundings were used when Gandalf was riding to Isengard (when the > camera > pans wide). > There are few things you need to realize before you start going to the > film > locations.  Most of the locations used were enhanced digitally or > converted > for the film and then converted back to their original state (so you may > not > recognize much). There are some amazing locations in NZ that did not > appear > in the film.  In my opinion. you should go to NZ to see the beauty of the > country and learn about the people, their way of life and their history. > If > you stumble upon a set, good. If not, I wouldn’t worry about it.  One of > my > best views in NZ was at the top of Treble Cone ski field on a cloudless > day > during spring.  Standing on top of a snow covered mountain with heaps of > powder beneath my feet.  And way down in the valley, vivid green grass, > and > the hills, mountains and blue sky reflecting in the two crystal clear > lakes. > I can still taste the crisp air. > Spend a couple of days exploring Fiordland, learn about Maori culture, do > a > bungy jump, a bone/greenstone carving, or climb a mountain and you’ll > forget > about the movies. > Dwayne > > Hi Dwayne, > > If I don’t need to join the Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown, shall > I > > allow to walk into the forest by myself.  I remember a NZ tour book > mentions > > that noone allows to get into the forest by themselves unless they join > the > > Lord if the Rings tour.  Is that true? > > Ta! > > PC > > > MAP: > > > http://www.backpack-newzealand.com/mapofsouthisland.html > > > Christchurch to Greymouth through Arthur’s Pass (Hokitika if you hire > a > > car) > > > Franz Joseph & Fox Glaciers (plus Lake Matheson walk) > > > Good views from Rob Roy (Mt. Aspiring National Park) and Mt. Iron > > > Queenstown (Ski or Board Cornet Peak or Remarkables, TC’s the best) > > > Good views from the Ben Lomond Saddle, plus you can get to the highest > > hill > > > above the Gondola (side track). > > > Hire a car (if you don’t already have one) drive to Te Anau. > > > Drive to Milford (2 hours if you don’t stop, I spent 4 hours and > missed > > the > > > walk to Key Summit and Lake Merian each is 3 hour). > > > Stay in Milford if you can this time of year, I’m assuming you can > (bring > > > food, there no shops only a cafe) > > > Take the cruise (underwater observatory is ok, if you dive then it > sux, > if > > > you’re on a budget skip it) > > > You NEED rain to see Milford at it’s finest. > > > The day trip to Milford from Queenstown is 13hour, and it’s a rushed > > > 13hours. > > > Then back to Queenstown and the Christchurch > > > If you still have some time go to Mount Cook Village before ending in > > > Christchurch. > > > Don’t bother taking a Lord of the Rings tour in Queenstown.  It’s > cheaper > > > and better to buy the guidebook (BEFORE you’re in Queenstown) and > hiring > a > > > car. If you stay in backpackers you should meet up with people who > want > to > > > do the same things and can share the cost (NZ is very friendly). > > > Enjoy, > > > Dwayne > > > > I will be heading down first time to NZ. I have 10 days and want to > > > > make the best of it. I am into scenery. Most spectacular. Can anyone > > > > recommend a good itinerary keeping in mind I love seeing water! > > > > Time schedule is June 2005. > > > > Ta! > > > > MMG

Response:

>If I have only one full day to spend in mid Nov for taking photos & hiking, >but not skiing, I’m still deciding whether I shall go to Treble Cone or >Arthur Pass?  Which scenery is better for fulfilling my interests in regards >of weather also? >Ta! >PC

Arthur’s Pass. http://www.doc.govt.nz/Explore/002%7ETracks-and-Walks/index.asp Cathg

Response:

Question:

Hi, in december i wish to fly from melbourne or sydney to wellington. but come back from christchurch to melbourne. My problem is I need to find the cheapest fare possible. any suggestions on airlines or agents to keep the price down please.   many thanks.   john west

Response:

> Hi, in december i wish to fly from melbourne or sydney to wellington. > but come back from christchurch to melbourne. > … suggestions on airlines …

How about Virgin Blue? <http://www.virginblue.com.au> Bego — "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.   They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country   and our people, and neither do we."                                    - George W. Bush, 5.8.2004

Response:

For our trip we just ended up using Air New Zealand or Virgin Blue and used thier web sites.  Seemed to be the best we could do and their sites are easy to navigate. Larry

Response:

check pacificblue (virgin) and freedom websites – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi, in december i wish to fly from melbourne or sydney to wellington. > but come back from christchurch to melbourne. > My problem is I need to find the cheapest fare possible. any > suggestions on airlines or agents to keep the price down please.   > many thanks.   john west

Response:

> For our trip we just ended up using Air New Zealand or Virgin Blue and > used thier web sites.  Seemed to be the best we could do and their > sites are easy to navigate. > Larry

I’d suggest just finding a travel agent in your area. There are quite a few airlines doing trans-Tasman, and at competitive fares and you might have to muck about a fair bit on different web sites if you do it online yourself. Some of the main options are Qantas Air New Zealand Pacifc Blue (Virgin Blue international) Emirates Other airlines fly some routes too, including smaller Pacific airlines that sometimes have good fares. L.

Response:

> Hi, in december i wish to fly from melbourne or sydney to wellington. > but come back from christchurch to melbourne. > My problem is I need to find the cheapest fare possible. any > suggestions on airlines or agents to keep the price down please. > many thanks.   john west

House of Travel now has a website that compares 17 airlines flying Trans-Tasman & around the Pacific.  Of course most fly only to Auckland but you should at least be able to see what airlines there are on those routes & compare prices.  The beauty of the new pricing is that one way fares are readily available & so you can mix & match.  You may have to book quickly as seats are filling fast. Vicki

Response:

Question:

Hello, It’s the first time I come on this newsgroup. I’m a french student in anthropology, and I would like to study about Australia. I would like to know if it’s easy to come in the country for a student who is making a research, if life is expensive out there… etc. Is there a big difference between NZ and Australia? Wich one is better to your opinion for someone like me? Thank you for your advice! Caro.

Response:

> Hello, > It’s the first time I come on this newsgroup. > I’m a french student in anthropology, and I would like to study about > Australia. > I would like to know if it’s easy to come in the country for a student

Yes. > who is making a research,

In anthropology? You are probably better asking in an anthropology newsgroup. >if life is expensive out there… etc.

I would imagine that Australia is comparable to France, perhaps somewhat cheaper. And, if you are under 30, you can work quite easily. > Is there a big difference between NZ and Australia?

Yes. There are many big differences between Australia and NZ. Culturally they are similar in some respects. > Wich one is better to your opinion for someone like me?

For studying Australia, Australia would seem the better choice. > Thank you for your advice!

Try being more specific in your questions. > Caro.

Peter Webb

Response:

Peter Webb a

Question:

Hey, don’t take my word for it: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Music-of-the-United-States "By the 16th century, the large-scale immigration of English, French and Spanish settlers occurred, followed by the importation of Africans as slaves. The Africans were as culturally varied as the Native Americans, descended from hundreds of ethnic groups in West Africa. *****It is the profound influence of African-American music on these indigenous and European-descended cultures that marks American music as distinct from any other. ****** (emphasis added) Immigration from China began in large numbers in the 19th century, most of them settling on the West Coast. Later, Japanese, Indian, Scottish, Polish, Italian, Irish, Mexican, Swedish, Ukrainian and Armenian immigrants also arrived in large numbers. In the 19th century, African-Americans were freed from slavery following the American Civil War. The music of these slaves was primarily African in origin, displaying polyrhythm and other distinctly African traits. Work songs were popular, but it was spirituals which became a major foundation for music in the 20th century. Spirituals (or Negro spirituals, as they were then known) were Christian songs, dominated by passionate and earthy vocals. More rhythm-oriented dance music was also popular, especially at the turn of the 20th century, when African-American ragtime spread from urban blacks to whites across the country". — Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm "Speaking the Truth in times of Universal deceit is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Rock, Metal, Blues, Jazz, Afro Cuban, Latin (general) Funk, Disco, Reggae, > Rock Steady, Soul, Motown, etc etc. > Okay, John, this list of yours is a long, long way from "virtually all > popular music of this century has its roots in West African rhythms, which > is where the "pocket" concept originated."  The styles you’ve listed don’t > even come close to virtually all popular music of the century, in fact, it > would represent a small fraction of all popular music.  If you look at > overall record sales (and you have to, if you’re talking "popular" music, > and depending on how broadly you define the term "rock", then most of the > styles you’ve listed are a minor blip.  The biggest-selling single of all > time in the US was written by Dolly Parton, whose musical roots are clearly > Scots-Irish-folk-bluegrass, and the song itself is a slow ballad.  Popular > music in the 20th century was dominated by artists like Frank Sinatra, Tony > Bennett, Engelbert Humperdinck, Tennessee Ernie Ford, The Carpenters, etc. > Arrangers like Nelson Riddle and Billy Strayhorn weren’t doing West > African-influenced grooves.  Producers like Mitch Miller, Owen Bradley and > Chet Atkins weren’t doing West African-influenced grooves.  Enormously > popular composers like Cole Porter and Burt Bacharach weren’t doing West > African-influenced grooves.  You’ve got the whole problem of country and > western music to deal with if you’re talking about "virtually all popular > music."  From Buck Owens to Merle Haggard to Willie Nelson to Alan Jackson, > there ain’t no West African in there at all.  The whole folk thing — Bob > Dylan and Gordon Lightfoot weren’t doing no grooves.  Don’t underestimate > the popularity of acts like Bread, Seals and Crofts, America, etc.  With few > exceptions, big-band music of the 30s and 40s had a lot more to do with > music-hall tradition and John Philip Sousa marches than anything done in > West Africa.  Look at big acts like Elton John, John Denver, even the > Eagles.  Go down the list of Elvis Presley’s hit singles and look at how few > of them really are blues-based.  Hell, even look objectively at most of > Motown’s big hits — they had very little to do with anything you could > trace back to West Africa.  And then look at the Beatles — the subject of > the biggest all-time musical lie that everyone seems to accept as universal > truth: "The Beatles were just recycling American black music."  The truth is > that the Beatles, early on in their career, covered a handful of Chuck > Berry, Barrett Strong, etc., and then never did anything again that > resembled "American black music" (whatever that is — as if all American > black music fits in one category).  From Norwegian Wood to When I’m > Sixty-Four to Yesterday, I don’t care where you look, you ain’t gonna find > American black music, or anything West African.  There are so many > influences found in modern pop music, African is one of them, but it’s not > as important as folk, or classical, or English music-hall, or Broadway show > tunes, etc.

Response:

> Google this:  bass player behind beat

I did this, but it doesn’t really shed much light. It seems that drummers basically want the bass to be right in with them. For example, Peter Erskine says: When I play a quarter-note pulse on my ride cymbal, I visualize the tip of my stick as the tip of the bass player’s finger plucking the string. I think this issue is often confused with swing. It’s very clear (to my ear) that moving the upbeat around from behind the (mathematically exact) eight or sixteenth triplet to right on to ahead of it changes the feel dramatically. Ahead makes it like a fast country swing, right on is a relaxed sound, behind it is like a loping reggae plus some major weed. Drummers do a similar thing with playing an "echo" snare hit an eighth or sixteenth after the main offbeat snare. Letting that lag a bit is very groovy. An example is Eddie Bayer’s line on Wynonna’s "I Saw the Light" (just to pick a pop/country example off the top of my head). But… it seems this discussion is about where to put the downbeat. Now, if *everybody* is playing *every* beat ahead or behind the "beat"… then everybody is back on it! So what the h— are we talking about here? The bass playing ahead or behind the quarter-note ride cymbal? Ahead or behind the bass drum? I have never met a drummer (or other band members) who wanted me to play ahead or behind the bass drum. Now. There is the phenomenon that in order for the bass to *sound* in with the bass drum, you have to play it a bit early because it takes some time for the note to grow, and some time for the ear to latch on to it. But then it *sounds* right in with the bass drum. I would have a very hard time consistently leading or lagging the bass drum. So let’s get more specific. Ahead or behind what part of the drum line? Andrew

Response:

> >Of course it’s almost impossible to be sure where anything derived from, >there are such strong similaritires between rhythms from all over the >place, > I worked with a chinese woman who is a Pipa (a 3 string lute) virtuoso > whose improvisation sounded heavily influenced by Lightning Hopkins and > Mississippi Fred McDowell. She’d never heard of those guys or really > listened to the blues at all. though.

We have a Taiwanese erhu player (2 string violin) in our band and our music is derived from all over the place.  No matter what we play he can pick something that fits – and he swings like Django Reinhardt even though I don’t think he’d ever heard of him before. Very often one member of the band will play something from, say, macedonia, and someone else will say "Oh, we have that same rhythm in Taiwan".  Which is why I’m now so suspicious of "This derived from such and such part of the world" statements, when it could just as easily have derived from many other places. — Derek — Many Hands   – Trans Cultural Music from Aotearoa/New Zealand http://www.manyhands.co.nz/

Response:

> OK, I’ll say this again: > I DID NOT say all music comes from Africa!  (although in a sense, we ALL > come from Africa).

What you said was "virtually all popular music of this century has its roots in West African rhythms, which is where the "pocket" concept originated." If you’d said, "the pocket originated in West Africa and has since been incorporated in the majority of popular musical forms" I would have far less issue with the statement.  Which is to say I’m not entirely *convinced* that the origins of ‘the pocket’ are west african, I believe that a similar concept has evolved wherever melodic (especially bass) instruments play with percussive instruments.  However, I don’t wish to get embroiled in "this pocket is more like that pocket" arguments. Instead you placed the emphasis on *all* and *roots*.   The all part is clearly wrong on two counts, the world is very big, most popular music isn’t strongly influenced by the ‘african derived american’ music of the 20th century.  Heck, even most *american* music (country, folk, bluegrass) has its *roots* elsewhere.  To me, the ‘roots’ of a musical form have to be where the majority influence of that form came from. > What I said was: The beat or rhythm of "popular music" from about the late > 1800’s on to today has it’s origins in the West African countries most > impacted by the slave trade.

I think you mean "popular music in America", which is a subset of "popular music".  You also have fallen into the ‘Hmm, the slave boats left from West Africa, therefore they must all be West African’ trap. The slave trade in Africa was already well established by the time the Americas got involved, and people were trafficked via long established routes from Central and east africa, as far down as Malawi.   > I don’t claim to be a musicologist, but if you > want to learn about shuffle rhythms or playing behind the beat, Traditional > West African music would be an obvious place to start for me.

I feel very uncomfortable talking about ‘west african’ music as though it is one homogeneous form.  West Africa is made up of something like 15 countries, and heaven alone knows how many tribes.  Each has there own distinctive music.  I pick a piece of west african music (toumani diabate, from Mali) and the bass is ahead of the beat.  The next pick is Toure Kunda from Senegal – one of my favourite bands – they’re so funky it’s unreal – first track I listen to is just Kora, second one, there’s this little grace note just before the 1 at the beginning of each bar (I wondered where I’d got that technique from).   So, I’ll try Rokia Traore, that’s really laid back music from Mali – bugger me if the bass isn’t ahead of the beat on the first track I listen too.  I could be wrong on that one though, it took me a while to decide where the ‘beat’ actually was (the piece is kanan neni).   If you ask me, the ‘pocket’ as we know it derives from Cuba, where african and european influences (specifically the flamenco compas) were brought together.  I’m not going to state that as a ‘fact’ though, just offering it up for debate.   The point I’m trying to make is that the conceipt that ‘american popular music’ is derived from ‘west african rhythms’ is something originated by white ethnomusicologists with too narrow a focus and who hadn’t listened to enough.  These days, when recordings of fragments from all over are available – and more importantly people are travelling and talking about their music in person – the origins of streams of music just become more difficult to trace.   Just as you think you’ve got the clave pinned down to a place in Cuba, where it was derived from a rhythm from a place in Africa you hear something so similar in Flamenco.   Which came first?  Maybe it’s no longer possible to tell. — Many Hands   – Trans Cultural Music from Aotearoa/New Zealand http://www.manyhands.co.nz/

Response:

OK, I’ll say this again: I DID NOT say all music comes from Africa!  (although in a sense, we ALL come from Africa). What I said was: The beat or rhythm of "popular music" from about the late 1800’s on to today has it’s origins in the West African countries most impacted by the slave trade. I don’t claim to be a musicologist, but if you want to learn about shuffle rhythms or playing behind the beat, Traditional West African music would be an obvious place to start for me. C&W does indeed share some elements of this history. It mixes European folk music with elements of Blues and Gospel. Nowadays, you can also add rock to the mix. Like most other things in America, our music is a mongrel mix of cultures that just happened to be thrown together, yet the result is greater than the sum of the parts. — Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm "Speaking the Truth in times of Universal deceit is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Rock, Metal, Blues, Jazz, Afro Cuban, Latin (general) Funk, Disco, Reggae, > Rock Steady, Soul, Motown, etc etc. > All have their origins in African rhythms – west African in particular. > Well, allowing for confused ethnomusicologists who assume that, because > the slaves *departed* from West Africa they (or their music) > *originated* there, I’ll give you those styles as largely African > derived. > However, my understanding is that by far the most popular form of music > played in your US of A over the last century is "Country and Western" – > which has its origins more firmly in Europe than in Africa. > That’s ignoring the huge body of European popular music from the last > century (we haven’t lived enough of this century to tell) that has it’s > origins in Europe and the middle/near east, or the huge body of middle > eastern popular music that has its origins in the middle east, europe > and asia, or the huge body of popular music played throughout India and > asia that only has a tangential association with Africa… > — Derek > — > Many Hands   – Trans Cultural Music from Aotearoa/New Zealand > http://www.manyhands.co.nz/

Response:

>Of course it’s almost impossible to be sure where anything derived from, >there are such strong similaritires between rhythms from all over the >place,

I worked with a chinese woman who is a Pipa (a 3 string lute) virtuoso whose improvisation sounded heavily influenced by Lightning Hopkins and Mississippi Fred McDowell. She’d never heard of those guys or really listened to the blues at all. though. >and after two or three centuries of global cultural assimilation >and diaspora it’s almost impossible to find an untainted example of any >musical form to compare against.

That’s the truth. It’s still interesting and really good for your playing to try and figure out where the music you like comes from. I’m finding it increasingly harder definitive statements on something’s origin though as I keep hearing new things in music I’ve been listening to for years. Just when you think you got it all figured out… jeffb

Response:

I’ll buy that – I mustn’t have read your statement properly.  My bad. Steve, eh? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >I never said ALL western music comes from Africa. Obviously, modern melodic >and particular harmonic approaches have Classical European origins. But I’m >sure as shit that Bootsy Collins’ GROOVE did not come from Bach. >Recipe for "groove" oriented music: Start with African slaves brought to the >Americas. Take West African tribal music, add European instruments, put >European Melodies and harmonies on top, throw in some pentatonic scales and >indigenous elements – mix well and let simmer for 500 years. >What I’m TRYING to show you is the origin of beat and pocket, which is what >you asked about. Please take a listen to the examples I posted, and see if >you can hear what I’m talking about.

Response:

> Rock, Metal, Blues, Jazz, Afro Cuban, Latin (general) Funk, Disco, Reggae, > Rock Steady, Soul, Motown, etc etc.

Okay, John, this list of yours is a long, long way from "virtually all popular music of this century has its roots in West African rhythms, which is where the "pocket" concept originated."  The styles you’ve listed don’t even come close to virtually all popular music of the century, in fact, it would represent a small fraction of all popular music.  If you look at overall record sales (and you have to, if you’re talking "popular" music, and depending on how broadly you define the term "rock", then most of the styles you’ve listed are a minor blip.  The biggest-selling single of all time in the US was written by Dolly Parton, whose musical roots are clearly Scots-Irish-folk-bluegrass, and the song itself is a slow ballad.  Popular music in the 20th century was dominated by artists like Frank Sinatra, Tony Bennett, Engelbert Humperdinck, Tennessee Ernie Ford, The Carpenters, etc. Arrangers like Nelson Riddle and Billy Strayhorn weren’t doing West African-influenced grooves.  Producers like Mitch Miller, Owen Bradley and Chet Atkins weren’t doing West African-influenced grooves.  Enormously popular composers like Cole Porter and Burt Bacharach weren’t doing West African-influenced grooves.  You’ve got the whole problem of country and western music to deal with if you’re talking about "virtually all popular music."  From Buck Owens to Merle Haggard to Willie Nelson to Alan Jackson, there ain’t no West African in there at all.  The whole folk thing — Bob Dylan and Gordon Lightfoot weren’t doing no grooves.  Don’t underestimate the popularity of acts like Bread, Seals and Crofts, America, etc.  With few exceptions, big-band music of the 30s and 40s had a lot more to do with music-hall tradition and John Philip Sousa marches than anything done in West Africa.  Look at big acts like Elton John, John Denver, even the Eagles.  Go down the list of Elvis Presley’s hit singles and look at how few of them really are blues-based.  Hell, even look objectively at most of Motown’s big hits — they had very little to do with anything you could trace back to West Africa.  And then look at the Beatles — the subject of the biggest all-time musical lie that everyone seems to accept as universal truth: "The Beatles were just recycling American black music."  The truth is that the Beatles, early on in their career, covered a handful of Chuck Berry, Barrett Strong, etc., and then never did anything again that resembled "American black music" (whatever that is — as if all American black music fits in one category).  From Norwegian Wood to When I’m Sixty-Four to Yesterday, I don’t care where you look, you ain’t gonna find American black music, or anything West African.  There are so many influences found in modern pop music, African is one of them, but it’s not as important as folk, or classical, or English music-hall, or Broadway show tunes, etc.

Response:

> >However, my understanding is that by far the most popular form of music >played in your US of A over the last century is "Country and Western" – >which has its origins more firmly in Europe than in Africa. > Very debatable. Of course there is no denying C&W’s european influences > but by the time it hit the Hank Williams era the influence of the blues > was hugely evident. I’d tend to want to qualify your assessment by say > that "in some ways" C&W has its origins more firmly in Europe than in > Africa because in some ways in most certainly does not.

When I listen to Country and Western, and especially related forms such as blue grass, I can clearly hear melodic and rhythmic patterns trom gaelic music, and also from eastern european music.   The original statement was pretty unequivocal – "virtually all popular music of this century has its roots in West African rhythms", and yet the most popular form of music in the USA has it’s roots firmly in Europe – influenced by ‘the blues’, yes, has it’s roots in west african rhythms?  I think there is vigorous room for debate on that score.   Of course it’s almost impossible to be sure where anything derived from, there are such strong similaritires between rhythms from all over the place, and after two or three centuries of global cultural assimilation and diaspora it’s almost impossible to find an untainted example of any musical form to compare against. — Derek — Many Hands   – Trans Cultural Music from Aotearoa/New Zealand http://www.manyhands.co.nz/

Response:

>However, my understanding is that by far the most popular form of music >played in your US of A over the last century is "Country and Western" – >which has its origins more firmly in Europe than in Africa.

Very debatable. Of course there is no denying C&W’s european influences but by the time it hit the Hank Williams era the influence of the blues was hugely evident. I’d tend to want to qualify your assessment by say that "in some ways" C&W has its origins more firmly in Europe than in Africa because in some ways in most certainly does not. jeffb

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->However, my understanding is that by far the most popular form of music >played in your US of A over the last century is "Country and Western" – >which has its origins more firmly in Europe than in Africa. > Very debatable. Of course there is no denying C&W’s european influences > but by the > time it hit the Hank Williams era the influence of the blues was hugely > evident. I’d > tend to want to qualify your assessment by say that "in some ways" C&W has > its origins > more firmly in Europe than in Africa because in some ways in most > certainly does not. > jeffb

I am amazed at how close some of the Irish and Scottish music is to America’s Blue Grass music. It is easy to see the similarities. African/black musicians of the period led to the development of the banjo. Where would bluegrass music be without a banjo? It wouldn’t. Ed Cregger

Response:

> Rock, Metal, Blues, Jazz, Afro Cuban, Latin (general) Funk, Disco, Reggae, > Rock Steady, Soul, Motown, etc etc. > All have their origins in African rhythms – west African in particular.

Well, allowing for confused ethnomusicologists who assume that, because the slaves *departed* from West Africa they (or their music) *originated* there, I’ll give you those styles as largely African derived. However, my understanding is that by far the most popular form of music played in your US of A over the last century is "Country and Western" – which has its origins more firmly in Europe than in Africa. That’s ignoring the huge body of European popular music from the last century (we haven’t lived enough of this century to tell) that has it’s origins in Europe and the middle/near east, or the huge body of middle eastern popular music that has its origins in the middle east, europe and asia, or the huge body of popular music played throughout India and asia that only has a tangential association with Africa… — Derek — Many Hands   – Trans Cultural Music from Aotearoa/New Zealand http://www.manyhands.co.nz/

Response:

I never said ALL western music comes from Africa. Obviously, modern melodic and particular harmonic approaches have Classical European origins. But I’m sure as shit that Bootsy Collins’ GROOVE did not come from Bach. Recipe for "groove" oriented music: Start with African slaves brought to the Americas. Take West African tribal music, add European instruments, put European Melodies and harmonies on top, throw in some pentatonic scales and indigenous elements – mix well and let simmer for 500 years. What I’m TRYING to show you is the origin of beat and pocket, which is what you asked about. Please take a listen to the examples I posted, and see if you can hear what I’m talking about. — Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm "Speaking the Truth in times of Universal deceit is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> …except for all the harmony we took from Bach and his > contemporaries…. I’m pretty sure he wasn’t African. > Steve, eh? >Rock, Metal, Blues, Jazz, Afro Cuban, Latin (general) Funk, Disco, Reggae, >Rock Steady, Soul, Motown, etc etc. >All have their origins in African rhythms – west African in particular. >IMO uniflying elements are the "3 on 4" polyrhythms, and the delayed beats >which often create a "loping" rhythm pattern. >I guess the best thing to do is listen. Here is some traditional drum music >from Ghana: >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001003/0/002-11… 3185657 >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001005/0/002-11… 3185657 >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001006/0/002-11… 3185657 >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001007/0/002-11… 3185657 >Not very hard for me to see the connection. Replace the forbidden drums with >guitar, banjo and horns, and you have the beginings of Blues and Jazz.

Response:

[snippage] > As for playing ahead of the beat – hate to say it, but that’s usually > the province of white guys playing punk and metal. The best examples I > can think of today are Green Day and Blink 182. I just bought a Meshuggh > CD that pushes the peat pretty intensely.

Hmm, I’ve always wondered… what about (not yet Sir) McCartney playing the bass part for TaxMan? That sounds really aggressive. I haven’t tried any visual computer tools to analyze it and I’m not sure my ear is good enough, and I suppose I don’t even know what to listen for… Is he playing right on top of the beat? Even a bit ahead of the beat in the fast (stumbling?) part? It seems to work in that tune, contributing a psychological feeling of paranoia and unease (waiting for an audit?). …or maybe I’m just another white guy, commenting on another white guy? BTW, is that the (supposedly typical) Rick bass "klank" on hears in there? …just trying to learn some… (more?) Ah, while I’m tormenting you all… What about major/minor bass patterns? The Beatles rock ‘n’ roll has a decidedly major sound to it, and all the bass parts are major runs. I think I’ve noticed some bass players playing minor bass runs to what would otherwise be major chords. I’ve done that myself in some tunes, because it seemed to sound better that way. Tin ear? or is that understandable (if not excusable) on the basis of musical "colour"? When I realized the discrepancy, it really bothered me. Help? …reminds me of a jazz piano player that I saw on TV who would only play "shots" with fists or palms. Didn’t sound as bad as I thought it should. Another question: I remember (at least) one recording where Taj Mahal is yelling for the band? bass? to "push it, push it". Is that because they were laying too far behind the beat? He did slowly "push up the tempo". TIA — Juhan Leemet Logicognosis, Inc.

Response:

> virtually all popular music of this > century has its roots in West African rhythms, which is where the "pocket" > concept originated.

I assume you mean the 20th century, not the current one.  If so, then this statement is wildly wrong.  John, give me some basis for saying that virtually all popular music of the last century has its roots in west African rhythms.

Response:

Rock, Metal, Blues, Jazz, Afro Cuban, Latin (general) Funk, Disco, Reggae, Rock Steady, Soul, Motown, etc etc. All have their origins in African rhythms – west African in particular. IMO uniflying elements are the "3 on 4" polyrhythms, and the delayed  beats which often create a "loping" rhythm pattern. I guess the best thing to do is listen. Here is some traditional drum music from Ghana: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001003/0/002-11… http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001005/0/002-11… http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001006/0/002-11… http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001007/0/002-11… Not very hard for me to see the connection. Replace the forbidden drums with guitar, banjo and horns, and you have the beginings of Blues and Jazz. — Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm "Speaking the Truth in times of Universal deceit is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> virtually all popular music of this > century has its roots in West African rhythms, which is where the "pocket" > concept originated. > I assume you mean the 20th century, not the current one.  If so, then this > statement is wildly wrong.  John, give me some basis for saying that > virtually all popular music of the last century has its roots in west > African rhythms.

Response:

…except for all the harmony we took from Bach and his contemporaries…. I’m pretty sure he wasn’t African. Steve, eh? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Rock, Metal, Blues, Jazz, Afro Cuban, Latin (general) Funk, Disco, Reggae, >Rock Steady, Soul, Motown, etc etc. >All have their origins in African rhythms – west African in particular. >IMO uniflying elements are the "3 on 4" polyrhythms, and the delayed  beats >which often create a "loping" rhythm pattern. >I guess the best thing to do is listen. Here is some traditional drum music >from Ghana: >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001003/0/002-11… >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001005/0/002-11… >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001006/0/002-11… >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/clipserve/B0000058W6001007/0/002-11… >Not very hard for me to see the connection. Replace the forbidden drums with >guitar, banjo and horns, and you have the beginings of Blues and Jazz.

Response:

Jesus, I can’t write today. Besides way too many "Howevers", that should read "bass and drums" not "ass ands drums". Feel free to insert your own jokes here. — Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm "Speaking the Truth in times of Universal deceit is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?) > Unless you playing a symphony gig, the Lawrence Welk Show, or a in Rush > cover band, it’s ALWAYS appropriate. virtually all popular music of this > century has its roots in West African rhythms, which is where the "pocket" > concept originated. > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely? > The pocket itself is malleable and changes from tune to tune. However, it > should be consistent throughout the same tune. However, the ass ands drums > will "dig in" on some tunes and push the tune forward by pulling farther > back into the pocket. > As for hits and syncopations, these are always felt and played in relation > to the current pocket. One of my personal irritants when playing big band > charts is guys (ie drummers, horn players)  who can swing the tune in the > pocket, but who play hits and kicks on the beat like they’re in music theory > 101. > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat? > Tons. Some great examples are: Stevie Ray Vaughn and Double Trouble, any > Count Basie album, any Gene Harris/Three Sounds/Les McCann/Ahmad Jamal > album, Miles "Kind of Blue" or any of the Prestige releases (Cookin’, > Workin’, Smokin’ etc), Any Classic James Brown track, Any > Parliament/Funkadelic album, The Meters, Sly Stone, Al Green, Booker T and > the MG’s, Sam and Dave, Any mid 60’s Motown tune, etc. > You get the idea. > As for playing ahead of the beat – hate to say it, but that’s usually the > province of white guys playing punk and metal. The best examples I can think > of today are Green Day and Blink 182. I just bought a Meshuggh CD that > pushes the peat pretty intensely. > — > Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm > "Speaking the Truth in times of Universal deceit is a revolutionary act." — > George Orwell > So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind > the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of > the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  It felt kind > of weird, but I was starting to get it, and he was loving it.  This > brings me to a few questions: > When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?) > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely? > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat? > Thanks for any input! > Steve, eh?

Response:

> So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind > the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of > the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  

The choice of playing ahead of, or behind, the beast is one of the tools you, as a bass player, has of changing the feel of the piece.   > When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?)

To simplify incredibly – if you want the piece to sound more relaxed, play behind, if you want it to sound more edgy and excitable play ahead. > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely?

You should generally do this uniformly throughout any given section of the piece.  If you start moving around it will sound messy and confusing.  You may want to play in a different place for a bridge section.  The lead melodic instrument may often change the phrasing during a solo or melody, but bass and drums should be solid – otherwise you all end up just drifting around.  Of course, during solos you should feel free to experiment with phrasing ahead or behind the beat – just make sure you trust your drummer to stay rock steady if you choose to do so – and vice versa. > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat?

Listen to some ‘Police’ – ‘Tea in the Sahara’ springs to mind, but really anything up to syncronicity would be a good start.  Those guys played with feel by playing in different places relative to ‘the beat’. It’s also worth noting that you can have a situation where *no one* is playing on ‘the beat’, maybe the guitar and drums are anticipated, the bass behind, and the lead melodic instrument weaving around all over the place for feel.  I remember doing a recording to a ‘click track’, once everyone had done all their parts it was sounding clinical and lifeless … until the sound engineer muted the click and the piece came to life. No one had been playing ‘on’ the beat (as defined by the click) and taking it away left a hole full of feel.   — Derek — Many Hands   – Trans Cultural Music from Aotearoa/New Zealand http://www.manyhands.co.nz/

Response:

I’m familiar with Google…  I was looking for current people’s opinions – some people that I know from the group, etc. Thanks, Steve, eh? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind > the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of > the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  It felt kind > of weird, but I was starting to get it, and he was loving it.  This > brings me to a few questions: > When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?) > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely? > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat? > Thanks for any input! > Steve, eh? >Google this:  bass player behind beat >You will get a couple of names, mostly interviews with people commenting >on players playing ahead or behind the beat… >Chris >Chris

Response:

> When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?)

Unless you playing a symphony gig, the Lawrence Welk Show, or a in Rush cover band, it’s ALWAYS appropriate. virtually all popular music of this century has its roots in West African rhythms, which is where the "pocket" concept originated. > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely?

The pocket itself is malleable and changes from tune to tune. However, it should be consistent throughout the same tune. However, the ass ands drums will "dig in" on some tunes and push the tune forward by pulling farther back into the pocket. As for hits and syncopations, these are always felt and played in relation to the current pocket. One of my personal irritants when playing big band charts is guys (ie drummers, horn players)  who can swing the tune in the pocket, but who play hits and kicks on the beat like they’re in music theory 101. > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat?

Tons. Some great examples are: Stevie Ray Vaughn and Double Trouble, any Count Basie album, any Gene Harris/Three Sounds/Les McCann/Ahmad Jamal album, Miles "Kind of Blue" or any of the Prestige releases (Cookin’, Workin’, Smokin’ etc), Any Classic James Brown track, Any Parliament/Funkadelic album, The Meters, Sly Stone, Al Green, Booker T and the MG’s, Sam and Dave, Any mid 60’s Motown tune, etc. You get the idea. As for playing ahead of the beat – hate to say it, but that’s usually the province of white guys playing punk and metal. The best examples I can think of today are Green Day and Blink 182. I just bought a Meshuggh CD that pushes the peat pretty intensely. — Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm "Speaking the Truth in times of Universal deceit is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind > the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of > the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  It felt kind > of weird, but I was starting to get it, and he was loving it.  This > brings me to a few questions: > When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?) > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely? > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat? > Thanks for any input! > Steve, eh?

Response:

Thanks. Steve, eh? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Personally I find it appropriate when I play with a drummer who has a real >command of placement, IE if he ’s forward and strong, you just snuggle in >behind him, so that your envelopes give his attacks weight. If you played >"ahead" in that case, the groove would never "sit". More of a thing to do, >by my experience, in the blues idiom. Other styles vary, at times the entire >opposite is true. I think you could also describe it as playing right on >with the kick, no flams down there in the bottom , so that he feels as if >he’s playing the bass with his foot. >If you have an audio sequencer , and interesting experiment is to play a >very simple half note or quarter note line , tight with a kick, and then >shift it a few hairs either way , to see the audio effect. There is a sweet >spot where the two just blossom. Let’s just hope we can hit that live >consistently…. >I worked with a great shuffle blues drummer, and he had analyzed it to the >point where he broke his own playing up. He said that he played the kick >"forward" a touch, and the snare "back". In that case the bass felt good >strong and long up the "middle". >All subtle distinctions, but very good to get a handle on. >NeilN > So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind > the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of > the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  It felt kind > of weird, but I was starting to get it, and he was loving it.  This > brings me to a few questions: > When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?) > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely? > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat? > Thanks for any input! > Steve, eh?

Response:

So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  It felt kind of weird, but I was starting to get it, and he was loving it.  This brings me to a few questions: When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with appropriately?) Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots more closely? Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the beat? Thanks for any input! Steve, eh?

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind > the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of > the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  It felt kind > of weird, but I was starting to get it, and he was loving it.  This > brings me to a few questions: > When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?) > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely? > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat? > Thanks for any input! > Steve, eh?

Google this:  bass player behind beat You will get a couple of names, mostly interviews with people commenting on players playing ahead or behind the beat… Chris Chris

Response:

Personally I find it appropriate when I play with a drummer who has a real command of placement, IE if he ’s forward and strong, you just snuggle in behind him, so that your envelopes give his attacks weight. If you played "ahead" in that case, the groove would never "sit". More of a thing to do, by my experience, in the blues idiom. Other styles vary, at times the entire opposite is true. I think you could also describe it as playing right on with the kick, no flams down there in the bottom , so that he feels as if he’s playing the bass with his foot. If you have an audio sequencer , and interesting experiment is to play a very simple half note or quarter note line , tight with a kick, and then shift it a few hairs either way , to see the audio effect. There is a sweet spot where the two just blossom. Let’s just hope we can hit that live consistently…. I worked with a great shuffle blues drummer, and he had analyzed it to the point where he broke his own playing up. He said that he played the kick "forward" a touch, and the snare "back". In that case the bass felt good strong and long up the "middle". All subtle distinctions, but very good to get a handle on. NeilN

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> So – at the gig last night, the drummer suggested that I play behind > the beat more.  I found this interesting – he tells me that a lot of > the great bass players he plays with do this regularly.  It felt kind > of weird, but I was starting to get it, and he was loving it.  This > brings me to a few questions: > When is it appropriate?  (What style or tempo is this used with > appropriately?) > Do you do it uniformly over the tune or do you hit some of the shots > more closely? > Are there any good examples of recordings of players who do this?  Or > – similarly, what are recordings or examples of playing ahead of the > beat? > Thanks for any input! > Steve, eh?

Response:

Question:

>> Now I don’t know if I should include Stewart Island and especially the > Chathams. Point is, I am interested in the Moriori and all that. Have > you been to the Chathams, Peter? >Let me just say that I wish I had the time and money for such a trip! >That’s a good leisurely, thorough way to do it, short of doing the >backpacker thing and working your way around the country. I cover the >whole lot in 14 days, but then I like driving, and New Zealand has some >wonderful, uncrowded roads.

Incidentally, I don’t intend to drive (that’s how I will save the money). I will be going mostly by bus or even backpacker bus (if I must). I may on occasion rent a car. I will be alone and I am not happy driving alone in remote areas. Do you think  I will lose a lot by not driving? >I haven’t been to Stewart Island or the Chathams. Both are pretty much >off the tourist trail. Stewart has a few tourists, but it’s more time >and more expense to get there, and not a lot to see or do on arrival. >Comparitively, that is. Chathams more so.

Yes, I know :-( BUT A rtn flight to the Chathams in only $240 NZ dollars and I can have a flight from Wellington on a Mon and to Auckland on a Thu. Spend three days there and see the Moriori dendroglyphs. I think I’ll be bored, but what is the cost of a flight Wellington-Auckland? The alternative, is, of course, to do Wangarei, Taranaki and Waikato on the way from Wellington to Auckland. Oh, the dilemma! I suppose that is what you’d do, wouldn’t you? — JohnM

Response:

writes >I would suggest reducing weeks 4+5 into 1 to free an additional week for the >South Island. Probably by deleting Taupo and drive to Wellington

Taupo includes the Tongariro crossing which I want to do. This is one of NZ UNESCO sites. It only has three: Tongariro, Fjordland and the Antarctic Islands where you can’t really get to (at least you can go to the Chathams). As Peter notes, I am  missing Waikato and Wangarei, Mount Taranaki… — JohnM

Response:

> Incidentally, I don’t intend to drive (that’s how I will save the > money). I will be going mostly by bus or even backpacker bus (if I > must). I may on occasion rent a car. I will be alone and I am not happy > driving alone in remote areas. Do you think  I will lose a lot by not > driving?

If you have the time to go by public transport, probably not a lot. New Zealand really only has two industries – one is farming, the other tourism, and you can get around almost anywhere without too much hassle. You also get to meet a lot more people than if you drive where your fellow travellers are usually just blurred faces in speeding windows. Your needs are greatly different from mine, where I had two weeks to travel the whole island with a wife and two teenagers. I like driving, especially on New Zealand’s scenic and uncrowded roads, so I had a lot of fun, and it was the cheapest and most convenient option.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Current thinking is – made them 10 weeks. > for North Island > Week 1 Auckland > Week 2 Northland, rtn to Auckland > Week 3 Waitomo/Rotorua Whakatana/Gisborne > Week 4 Napier/ Taupo > Week 5 Taupo-Wellington. > for South Island > Week 1 Picton/Nelson/Kaikoura/Cristchurch > Week 2 Greymouth/glaciers/Queenstown > Week 3 Queenstown/Te Anau/Invercargill > Week 4 Stewart island/Dunedin – fly to Wellington > Week 5 Wellington-Chathams-Auckland. > Now I don’t know if I should include Stewart Island and especially the > Chathams. Point is, I am interested in the Moriori and all that. Have > you been to the Chathams, Peter? > — > JohnM

Greeting John – Multiple trips have brought me to say that, with careful planning, most areas of NZ can be experienced, if one has 2 months. That said, I do not mean that it will be in any great depth, but it will provide enough information that future visits can be made knowing how much depth you want to give to any specific area. Remember that you can’t do everything and compromises will be needed, therefore I suggest that you drop Chatham Islands from your plans. My recommendations are: You can cover Northland in 3-4 days, especially if you do not include Cape Reinga. You should include Hauraki Gulf islands – at least a day trip to the Tiritiri Matangi Island nature reserve. A trip to Great Barrier Island would take up at least 3 days, so you might want to save that for another time, but it is a great place to experience. For your third week, I suggest Auckland – Thames – Coromandel – Whitianga – Tauranga – Rotorua – Whakantane – East Cape – Gisbourne. Fourth week – Napier/Hastings – Taupo – then Hwy 1 to Palmerston North  then east through the gorge to Woodville and then south on Hwy 2 to Wellington. Week Five – Wellington area Week Six – Picton – Nelson – then Hwy 6 to Queenstown via Westport, Greymouth, Franz Josef, Wanaka. Week Seven – Queenstown – Te Anau (I assume Milford or Doubtful Sound) – Tuatapere – Riverton – Invercargill – Stewart Island. Week Eight – Stewart Island – Invercargill – Catlin coastal route to Dunedin – Oamaru – Christchurch. Week Nine – Christchurch area Week Ten – Wellington – coastal highway 3 and around Cape Egmont to New Plymouth – Waitomo – Auckland. There are many lesser known places to experience along these routings that a good guidebook, such as Lonely Planet, can suggest. If you have specific questions, email me. Charles nzvideos.org

Response:

You will see Whangarei when you visit Northland. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I would suggest reducing weeks 4+5 into 1 to free an additional week for >the >South Island. Probably by deleting Taupo and drive to Wellington > Taupo includes the Tongariro crossing which I want to do. This is one of > NZ UNESCO sites. It only has three: Tongariro, Fjordland and the > Antarctic Islands where you can’t really get to (at least you can go to > the Chathams). > As Peter notes, I am  missing Waikato and Wangarei, Mount Taranaki… > — > JohnM

Response:

>What is the best way to go from Whakanaka (White Island) to Napier? >Is it the coastal route via Gisborn or the inland route via Rotorua and >Taupo. I was thinking of going to Rotorua then Whakanaka then Napier >then Taupo.

Some links for you: http://aatravel.co.nz/map/about.shtml http://www.infocus.co.nz/default.asp http://www.franzjosefglacier.com/trips.html http://www.queenstown-nz.co.nz/information/Activities/ http://www.west-coast.co.nz/ http://www.nzyourway.com/default.asp?lang=english

Response:

xas.removethisbit.com writes — snip snip — Thanks. having a look, will return. — JohnM

Response:

>Multiple trips have brought me to say that, with careful planning, >most areas of NZ can be experienced, if one has 2 months. That said, I >do not mean that it will be in any great depth, but it will provide >enough information that future visits can be made knowing how much >depth you want to give to any specific area. Remember that you can’t >do everything and compromises will be needed, therefore I suggest that >you drop Chatham Islands from your plans. My recommendations are:

– snip snip — Let me absorb this Charles and thanks a lot. Yes, the Chathams are the obvious ones to drop…but, I have to think. I found one item very interesting. Do you think I should devote 1 week to Wellington and its surroundings? What would you include in its surroundings? I know people in Wellington, too, but not as well as in Auckland, so I could stay there longer. I am pleased that all of you think that 10 weeks is doing the country justice. I have been to NZ before (16 years ago) as part of a RTW trip, but my main destination then  was Australia, so I stuck to Auckland and Northland. I have been in Paihia before, but it rained a lot and didn’t see much. (It was October). However, NZ made a big impression on me and have wanted to return ever since, but I knew it had to be two months at least and that’s why I waited for so long to find the time and the money. — JohnM

Response:

writes >You will see Whangarei when you visit Northland.

Damn those names… I met Wanganui. Thank you Neil. I had better sort out my Whakanakas from my Whakatanes and my Whangareis from Wanganuis. Incidentally, whatever possessed those missionaries to transcribe the Maori F-sound to Wh ? The French over in Tahiti did it better IMO. — JohnM

Response:

>xas.removethisbit.com writes >– snip snip — >Thanks. having a look, will return.

If you find an area you think is interesting, do a web search i.e. West Coast New Zealand [I use excite.com]. Often there are a large number of websites, some specific to the area [i.e. websites hosted by local tourism councils, local companies offering services]. Sure it’s going to take time to get through them but it generally is well worth it in the end. In the end, only you can decide where you want to go; how long you want to stay, what you want to see etc. Cath

Response:

> Damn those names… I met Wanganui. Thank you Neil. I had better sort > out my Whakanakas from my Whakatanes and my Whangareis from Wanganuis. > Incidentally, whatever possessed those missionaries to transcribe the > Maori F-sound to Wh ?

It was one sick whacking joke. I knew it. All this time I’ve been saying Fuckertarney trying to get it right and they’ve been laughing at me. Bosterds. They probably switch the road signs around to confuse travellers. I’m sure I’ve passed through the same jigsaw of vowels a dozen times in different places. Te Peta

Response:

> I found one item very interesting. Do you think I should devote 1 week > to Wellington and its surroundings? What would you include in its > surroundings? I know people in Wellington, too, but not as well as in > Auckland, so I could stay there longer.

Auckland is nice, but for my money I’d spend longer in Wellington. Te Papa could easily take up a couple of days to do it properly, there’s galleries and gardens and all sorts of things. Wellington is just one fascinating city and it’s all very compact so it’s not dufficult to get around.

Response:

I would suggest reducing weeks 4+5 into 1 to free an additional week for the South Island. Probably by deleting Taupo and drive to Wellington – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Current thinking is – made them 10 weeks. > for North Island > Week 1 Auckland > Week 2 Northland, rtn to Auckland > Week 3 Waitomo/Rotorua Whakatana/Gisborne > Week 4 Napier/ Taupo > Week 5 Taupo-Wellington. > for South Island > Week 1 Picton/Nelson/Kaikoura/Cristchurch > Week 2 Greymouth/glaciers/Queenstown > Week 3 Queenstown/Te Anau/Invercargill > Week 4 Stewart island/Dunedin – fly to Wellington > Week 5 Wellington-Chathams-Auckland. > Now I don’t know if I should include Stewart Island and especially the > Chathams. Point is, I am interested in the Moriori and all that. Have > you been to the Chathams, Peter? > — > JohnM

Response:

> What is the best way to go from Whakanaka (White Island) to Napier? > Is it the coastal route via Gisborn or the inland route via Rotorua and > Taupo. I was thinking of going to Rotorua then Whakanaka then Napier > then Taupo.

Assume you mean Whakatane??  The most direct route is Highway 5, via Rotorua & Taupo – 310 Km; The alternative is Highway 2, via Gisborne (this is NOT coastal, but pretty much entirely inland) – 418 km Or the "scenic route" via East Cape as recommended by another poster – about 500 Km (you’d really need 2 days for this route as there is so much to see). Vicki

Response:

> What is the best way to go from Whakanaka (White Island) to Napier? > Is it the coastal route via Gisborn or the inland route via Rotorua and > Taupo. I was thinking of going to Rotorua then Whakanaka then Napier > then Taupo.

You might also like to try this link – you click on o0ne town & drag it to the destination town. http://discovernz.co.nz/driving/smlcalc.html Vicki

Response:

>> What is the best way to go from Whakanaka (White Island) to Napier? > Is it the coastal route via Gisborn or the inland route via Rotorua and > Taupo. I was thinking of going to Rotorua then Whakanaka then Napier > then Taupo. >Assume you mean Whakatane??  

Yes, I get confused… >The most direct route is Highway 5, via Rotorua >& Taupo – 310 Km; >The alternative is Highway 2, via Gisborne (this is NOT coastal, but pretty >much entirely inland) – 418 km >Or the "scenic route" via East Cape as recommended by another poster – about >500 Km (you’d really need 2 days for this route as there is so much to see).

Incidentally, how would you rate the Nelson area vs Franz-Josef- Queenstown-Te Anau? I am not particularly keen to go bungee jumping. How long do you think I should allow for Nelson and from Greymouth to INvercargill? I have budgeted for 9 weeks in NZ, at least 1 week of which will be Auckland to see friends. Question to Peter as well. — JohnM

Response:

> Incidentally, how would you rate the Nelson area vs Franz-Josef- > Queenstown-Te Anau? I am not particularly keen to go bungee jumping. How > long do you think I should allow for Nelson and from Greymouth to > INvercargill?

Only you can really answer that question. Nelson isn’t as big on dramatic scenery leaning in the window and saying hello, but it’s a great place to use as a base to wander through the forests to the south or the Marlborough Sounds to the north or the ocean coastline reserves to the west. Or even to stretch out to Kaikoura for some whale-watching, though that would make for a long day indeed. For myself, and if I had the money, I’d love to make my leisurely way down the island. I could happily spend a week at Queenstown and not do so much as a luge ride. The scenery is awesome, and I would be happy to sit on a lakefront balcony doing nothing beyond fetching myself another drink from time to time. If you wanted, you could get from Nelson to Invercargill in two solid days of driving by going down the east coast, stopping at Christchurch overnight. The roads are good, the traffic sparse. Or take your time and see all the good bits. If I had a month to "do" the South Island, I reckon I’d just sort of drift down as I pleased, sitting out the rainy days (or visiting things like museums and galleries) and using the clear days to see the scenery. I wouldn’t want to visit New Zealand and not see the Sounds, and while they have their attractions on a rainy day, I’d dearly love to see those sunny postcard views, and that pretty much means waiting for a clear day in either Te Anau or Queenstown. Cheers, Peter

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Incidentally, how would you rate the Nelson area vs Franz-Josef- > Queenstown-Te Anau? I am not particularly keen to go bungee jumping. How > long do you think I should allow for Nelson and from Greymouth to > INvercargill? >Only you can really answer that question. Nelson isn’t as big on >dramatic scenery leaning in the window and saying hello, but it’s a >great place to use as a base to wander through the forests to the south >or the Marlborough Sounds to the north or the ocean coastline reserves >to the west. Or even to stretch out to Kaikoura for some whale-watching, >though that would make for a long day indeed. >For myself, and if I had the money, I’d love to make my leisurely way >down the island. I could happily spend a week at Queenstown and not do >so much as a luge ride. The scenery is awesome, and I would be happy to >sit on a lakefront balcony doing nothing beyond fetching myself another >drink from time to time. >If you wanted, you could get from Nelson to Invercargill in two solid >days of driving by going down the east coast, stopping at Christchurch >overnight. The roads are good, the traffic sparse. >Or take your time and see all the good bits. If I had a month to "do" >the South Island, I reckon I’d just sort of drift down as I pleased, >sitting out the rainy days (or visiting things like museums and >galleries) and using the clear days to see the scenery. I wouldn’t want >to visit New Zealand and not see the Sounds, and while they have their >attractions on a rainy day, I’d dearly love to see those sunny postcard >views, and that pretty much means waiting for a clear day in either Te >Anau or Queenstown.

Current thinking is – made them 10 weeks. for North Island Week 1 Auckland Week 2 Northland, rtn to Auckland Week 3 Waitomo/Rotorua Whakatana/Gisborne Week 4 Napier/ Taupo Week 5 Taupo-Wellington. for South Island Week 1 Picton/Nelson/Kaikoura/Cristchurch Week 2 Greymouth/glaciers/Queenstown Week 3 Queenstown/Te Anau/Invercargill Week 4 Stewart island/Dunedin – fly to Wellington Week 5 Wellington-Chathams-Auckland. Now I don’t know if I should include Stewart Island and especially the Chathams. Point is, I am interested in the Moriori and all that. Have you been to the Chathams, Peter? — JohnM

Response:

> Now I don’t know if I should include Stewart Island and especially the > Chathams. Point is, I am interested in the Moriori and all that. Have > you been to the Chathams, Peter?

Let me just say that I wish I had the time and money for such a trip! That’s a good leisurely, thorough way to do it, short of doing the backpacker thing and working your way around the country. I cover the whole lot in 14 days, but then I like driving, and New Zealand has some wonderful, uncrowded roads. I haven’t been to Stewart Island or the Chathams. Both are pretty much off the tourist trail. Stewart has a few tourists, but it’s more time and more expense to get there, and not a lot to see or do on arrival. Comparitively, that is. Chathams more so. I don’t know much about the Chathams except that it was used by the British to imprison Maori "troublemakers", most famously the superb guerilla Te Kooti, who made a remarkable escape from the Chathams and terrorised the residents of the East Coast – Maori and pakeha alike. If I had the time I’d take a good look at some of the sites of the Maori Wars. The Maori seemed to take an inordinate amount of fun in outwitting British troops and dealt them some notable defeats. All the more extraordinary because the Maori were usually just stealing some time out of their normal farming activities to put in a campaign, while the British included some of their best Imperial troops. In fact at one time there were more British soldiers in New Zealand than there were in the UK itself. But I digress… Pete

Response:

What is the best way to go from Whakanaka (White Island) to Napier? Is it the coastal route via Gisborn or the inland route via Rotorua and Taupo. I was thinking of going to Rotorua then Whakanaka then Napier then Taupo. — JohnM

Response:

Hi people, —any idea how can it cost sending stuff (10-15 kilos) from Europe (italy) to NZ and which post company is the cheapest one? Thanks a lot, ciao ciao Matteo

Response:

sorry, I’ve made a mistake!!

Response:

> What is the best way to go from Whakanaka (White Island) to Napier? > Is it the coastal route via Gisborn or the inland route via Rotorua and > Taupo. I was thinking of going to Rotorua then Whakanaka then Napier > then Taupo.

Depends on your definition of "best". If you look at the map you’ll see an inland route from Opotiki to Gisborne through Matawai. That may well be the quickest, and it’s not too bad in terms of scenery either. Then there’s the tourist trail through Rotorua and Taupo. But for my money the best is the coastal route via East Cape where you’ll see spectacular views from a highway that often clings to the top of a huge cliff and some genuine Maori communities. This is where "Whale Rider" was filmed, and that is how the people live, with every school having an entrance carved in the old fashion. Peter

Response:

>But for my money the best is the coastal route via East Cape where >you’ll see spectacular views from a highway that often clings to the top >of a huge cliff and some genuine Maori communities. This is where "Whale >Rider" was filmed, and that is how the people live, with every school >having an entrance carved in the old fashion.

MMmm. let me go back to my plans. Thanks Peter — JohnM

Response:

> >But for my money the best is the coastal route via East Cape where >you’ll see spectacular views from a highway that often clings to the top >of a huge cliff and some genuine Maori communities. This is where "Whale >Rider" was filmed, and that is how the people live, with every school >having an entrance carved in the old fashion. > MMmm. let me go back to my plans. Thanks Peter

It’s hard to wrong in New Zealand, no matter what you do. Everywhere is good. It’s just that the best is superb. Which is probably why I’ve been such a fan for twenty years. Peter

Response: